Edward Snowden Right To Privacy

Improved Essays
Feelings of anxiety, tension and overwhelming fear seized the nation in July of 2013. Countless confidential files had been leaked, exposing the NSA’s undercover surveillance programs to the public. The National Security Agency had monitored individuals’ browsing habits and gathered a bulk of their personal information. Former CIA employer and NSA contractor Edward Snowden, responsible for stealing these government files, is currently “wanted” for espionage. His efforts to inform America of the government’s actions has fueled the ongoing controversial debate between the right to privacy and national security. Was the NSA truly justified in their surveillance methods? While many American citizens believed their privacy was violated, others understood the government’s reasoning behind the programs--to prevent threats to citizens’ safety. Does more information collected on individuals result in greater national security? With technology advancing and the internet being accessible almost anywhere, challenging questions, like these, arise. Rather than selecting one side to this debate, a compromise must be found so that citizens may exercise their right to privacy without jeopardizing the security of the nation. In order to better understand how to establish greater national security, it must first be recognized that information is power. …show more content…
Consider Los Angeles 2000, Detroit 2006 and Chicago 2014- times in which the FBI prevented both foreign and domestic terrorist plots from occurring. After surveilling the suspects to gather necessary evidence and subsequently issuing warrants for their arrests, each of the men were convicted of terrorism-related charges. In these three cases, using various surveillance methods and collecting vital information on the individuals contributed to the government’s success in protecting the lives of citizens. Information is undoubtedly essential for the government to defend the country. Using it wisely to stop threats before they happen and/or place the terrorists in custody is the authorities’ primary goal. Sometimes, unfortunate events happen unexpectedly. The bombings in Brussels and Paris as well as the mass shooting in Florida are recent tragedies that come to mind, which lead to the discussion: When is it acceptable to “violate” an individual's privacy? One of the most controversial incidents, the devastating shooting of December 2015 in San Bernardino, California, caused citizens to question their right to privacy versus security. Syed Farook, the person responsible for murdering 14 people, owned an iPhone; the FBI pressured Apple to unlock the shooter’s device. Due to the privacy agreement with their customers, Apple, specifically chief executive Tim Cook, challenged the FBI’s demands to ensure that all iPhone owners’ civil liberties remained protected. As a result, the FBI brought the case to federal court. Ultimately, the judge required Apple to provide the “reasonable technical assistance” for the FBI (Kharpal). This encryption dispute reveals that for matters of national security, the government must have immediate access to information so that individuals responsible for such attacks are brought to justice. Although citizens’ personal information is needed by the government at times to protect the country, advertising companies and online services should not have control over an individual’s personal details. “As businesses increasingly mine data about consumers, Americans are concerned about preserving their privacy when it comes to their personal information and behaviors” (Rainie, Maniam). In these instances, the lack of information does not threaten national security. Rather, it intensifies citizens’ anxieties about how to limit the amount of personal data companies can access. Numerous Americans do not feel confident that companies will be diligent in protecting their information. According to recent polls, 25% of Americans doubt credit card companies will secure their personal data, while 53% are hesitant about sharing details with online advertisers (Pew Research Center). Furthermore, 45% of Americans question whether their information is protected on social media sites. From these studies, it can be concluded that purchasing products online or creating social media accounts comes with a steep price--one’s privacy. In February of 2012, the Consumer Bill of Rights, proposed by President Obama, was introduced. The goal was for individuals to gain control of their information held by commercial companies. Currently, the bill has failed to pass. Without it, advertising companies and online services continue to abuse citizens’ personal information in the hope of increasing profits. Despite bipartisan support, government officials are not confident that the Consumer Bill of Rights will pass. As

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Article #1: Sinha, G. Alex. " NSA surveillance since 9/11 and the human right to privacy." Loyola Law ReviewWinter 2013: 861+. Academic OneFile. Web.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mitch Albom, author of “Mitch Albom: FBI vs. Apple about more than a phone”, builds an overall effective editorial that supports the readers point of view by fighting for the protection of our phone information. In this case, a man named Syed Farook, killed and injured several people, including his wife. The FBI believes that accessing information from his phone may be able to help them with their case. They order Apple to build a new software that will allow them to bust into phones by being able to guess passwords as many times as they want; as of now, someone can only guess a password 10 times before the information is lost. In court, the FBI fights that the law requires businesses not involved in the case, have to execute court orders.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Post 9/11 Privacy Rights: The Case Against Electronic Surveillance In response to concerns about terrorism after the attacks on September 11,2001, the government of the United States enacted new guidelines for conducting surveillance on the public. This paper will discuss the implementation of electronic surveillance as a tool to combat terrorism and will make the case against sweeping electronic surveillance of American citizens and others in this country. Various examples of increased surveillance along with decreasing privacy right will help the reader to conclude that these tactics have not reduced incidents of any type of crime, including terrorism. This paper will also discuss several types of electronic surveillance, including the collection of metadata from telephone records, which intruded on the private lives of citizens and did not increase their safety in any meaningful way.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Why Privacy Matters

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Privacy is not frequently undermined by a solitary great act, yet rather by a moderate aggregation of little unobtrusive acts. Every act may appear to be innocuous, yet in time the government will be watching and knowing every little thing about us. Solove states that even if you don't have anything to hide, the government can hurt coincidentally, because of mistakes or carelessness. All in all, he fights that when you comprehend the immeasurable measure of privacy concerns connected with government data gathering and observation, the nothing-to-hide argument is less powerful. This essay addresses the ramifications of proceeded with government data accumulation and reconnaissance, before these practices get to be marked into perpetual law as a major aspect of the USA Patriot Act.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On September 11, 2001, one of the most horrific terrorist attacks in United States history took place. After the planes had collided with the Twin Towers, the masses of the United States of America suddenly was hit with anxiety and concern. America was prepared to lose their confidentiality in exchange for refuge from whatever dangers may follow in the future. When the Homeland Security Act, was passed in 2002 by President Bush, It showed how much the American people favored the constant surveillance by the government than the danger of being in harm's way. H.L. Mencken, an American essayist, and social critic wrote, “The average man does not want to be free.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Apple Vs FBI

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Bryce Hickle Prof. Whitaker Rhetoric 14 March 2017 Apple v. FBI: Apple should have complied Syed Farook is one of the terrorists involved in the massacre that took place in San Bernardino in 2015 which resulted in the murder of fourteen people. Apple v. FBI was a legal dispute involving whether or not Apple should comply with a warrant demanding them to install a back door program into this dead terrorist’s cellphone. People who defended Apple’s position had made claims stating that it was legal for Apple to choose not to comply and that making a back door program would be either not possible, dangerous, or both. However, these statements are not true. Not only was it possible for Apple to comply with the FBI’s demands without endangering…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance. Plan: The government will curtail its surveillance by only viewing collected data by means of a warrant. Intro-After the NSA reported their first transparency avowal, the publisher Omicron Technology Limited stated, “The report said 19,212 "national security letters"—administrative subpoenas that allow the FBI to collect information without a warrant—were issued last year, containing 38,832 requests for information.” These unwarranted leaks are why this problem needs to be solved. That is why we stand resolved that “The United States federal government should substantially curtain its domestic surveillance.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The NSA’s primary way of fighting terrorism, as previously noted, was through the collection and surveillance of every citizens’ communications data – known as “The Program” according to the documentary. However, not only is “The Program” unconstitutional and illegal, it has also proven to be less than helpful in contributing to the counter-terrorism efforts. While several top government officials – including President Obama, former President George W. Bush, former Vice President Cheney, former NSA Chief Michael Hayden, and others – claim that many threats have been averted thanks to “The Program,” a report found, according to Anna Mulrine, that “traditional investigative methods, such as the use of informants, tips from local communities, and targeted intelligence operations, provided…for investigations in the majority of cases, while the contribution of NSA’s bulk surveillance programs to these cases was minimal…playing an identifiable role in initiating, at most, 1.8 percent of these cases” (Mulrine, Anna). She goes on, with a quote from a source saying “’it can’t justify the gathering of these millions of records when it can be done another way where the government doesn’t have to obtain all of that information’” (Mulrine, Anna).…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The creation of the Department of Homeland Security and establishment of the US Patriot Act was a result of the understanding that in order to have freedom, certain aspects of daily life would have to change. One aspect of change has been law enforcement’s move towards militarization, evolving from basic military like organizational structure to changes in uniform colors, equipment and vehicles. Citizens see this evolution as a “police vs citizens” stance rather than community oriented policing. The other and more clandestine policing problem has been the National Security Agency (NSA) and its domestic surveillance. While domestic surveillance is said to provide valuable evidence to prevent terrorism, it has resulted in whistleblowers like Edward Snowden leaking classified information exposing the extent of the surveillance and the infringement on personal privacy.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Following these acts of terrorism, The United States government implemented an act designed to enable law enforcement and government agencies to investigate, interrogate and prosecute anyone fitting their profile for the terrorist attacks. President Bush authorized the Patriot Act in October of 2001 with the hope that it would prevent further terrorist attacks. The Patriot Act began with good intentions but does it really protect us from outside attacks or does it take away our freedom? My goal in this paper is to investigate how the Patriot Act defends Americans and what limits it brings to American freedom.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The events of September 11, 2001 will never be forgotten by the American people. One of the largest changes made in the United States after 9/11 was the introduction of the USA Patriot Act on October 26, 2001. The act allows US government agencies to easily gain access to the private records of people within the United States. The records include phone records, banking statements, and credit reports. Without any limits on the power of government agencies, the possibility of infringing on the rights of private citizens arises.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apple should not provide the encryption code to unlock the iPhone of Syed Farook- one of the San Bernardino Shooters. Though the U.S government is seeking this encryption code in the name of national security, this access to millions of American’s personal information can too easily lead to the compromise of people’s 4th amendment rights. Moreover, this access may increase the targeting of minority groups such as Muslim American and African Americans. Using examples from Rampage and The New Jim Crow, I will demonstrate that this breach of privacy should be avoided and prove that it is inessential to combating domestic terrorism.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The fourth amendment states that the right of the people to be “secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (U.S. Const., amend. IV). The NSA spying on U.S citizens is similar to an unreasonable search through a person’s private documents. Whether or not the U.S government feels they are justified for their actions, they are not. The attempts of the head members of NSA to paint Edward Snowden as a criminal, are hypocritical, and are a transparent ploy to shift the negativity away from…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The surveillance program is effective with preventing terrorist attacks, but this violates the Fourth Amendment right because they are collecting data from everywhere and everyone around the country. According to the News Team staff of cfr.org people are starting to revolt against these outraeous and unlawful actions. Judge Richard J. Leon said “ surely such a program infringes that degree of privacy, that our founding fathers enshrined in the Fourth Amendment” (www.cfr.org). After, the exposure of the NSA in the mid-2013 American citizens have started to protest against these unlawful actions and development movements to protect their right of…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine living in a world where the government had complete control and access to your personal secrets. This world might soon come upon us if we don’t take a stand against the F.B.I. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is convinced that they have the right to forcefully intrude on an individual daily life when they choose. In March of 2016 went against the F.B.I beliefs by sticking to its ideals and protecting individuals rights. Apple did this by refusing to help the F.B.I unlock an iPhone belonging to Syed Farook. In this writing I will focus on the importance of privacy, security, and consumer trust.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays