He states that Hester’s thoughts and actions violate the Puritan principals that govern life for the Bostonians, saying that “Hester becomes a radical. She believes that sometime ‘a new truth’ will be revealed and that ‘the whole relation between man and woman’ will be established ‘on a surer ground of mutual happiness’” (147). He explains that Hester believes sexism will be removed from society in the future, supporting this assertion by showing that feministic traits are displayed in Hester’s thoughts. In contrast, the novel also displays anti-feministic beliefs. For instance, the narrator describes the women outside the prison: “Morally, as well as materially, there was a coarser fibre [sic] in those wives and maidens of old English birth and breeding than in their fair descendants … for, throughout that chain of ancestry, every successive mother had transmitted to her child a fainter bloom, a more delicate and briefer beauty, and a slighter physical frame” (Hawthorne 57). This contradicts the novel’s feministic theme, as Hawthorne compares the women of the novel to the women of the 1800s were “more delicate” than their ancestors. The opposing themes of feminism and anti-feminism further exemplify the ambiguity of The Scarlet Letter. In his essay, Chase cites the poet and critic, Yvon Winters, to support his argument of the novel’s ambiguity. Winters states that The Scarlet Letter is a
He states that Hester’s thoughts and actions violate the Puritan principals that govern life for the Bostonians, saying that “Hester becomes a radical. She believes that sometime ‘a new truth’ will be revealed and that ‘the whole relation between man and woman’ will be established ‘on a surer ground of mutual happiness’” (147). He explains that Hester believes sexism will be removed from society in the future, supporting this assertion by showing that feministic traits are displayed in Hester’s thoughts. In contrast, the novel also displays anti-feministic beliefs. For instance, the narrator describes the women outside the prison: “Morally, as well as materially, there was a coarser fibre [sic] in those wives and maidens of old English birth and breeding than in their fair descendants … for, throughout that chain of ancestry, every successive mother had transmitted to her child a fainter bloom, a more delicate and briefer beauty, and a slighter physical frame” (Hawthorne 57). This contradicts the novel’s feministic theme, as Hawthorne compares the women of the novel to the women of the 1800s were “more delicate” than their ancestors. The opposing themes of feminism and anti-feminism further exemplify the ambiguity of The Scarlet Letter. In his essay, Chase cites the poet and critic, Yvon Winters, to support his argument of the novel’s ambiguity. Winters states that The Scarlet Letter is a