Cloud presented the significance self-leadership. The part that challenged me was the importance of a leader receiving feedback. As I reflect upon my leadership development, I am ashamed that I do not eagerly seek out feedback. Dr. Cloud explained why leaders do not invite feedback, and I found myself identifying with his description. I believe my trepidation is connected with the foundation of trust, namely, the intention of the person offering the feedback. If I believe the feedback is coming from a person that sincerely has my best interest at heart, then I am more open to receive it. However, if I am not confident of his or her intentions, then I have found myself avoiding and fighting it. Thus, I must work on building trust with people around me so that I can feel safe to receive feedback that will assist me in my …show more content…
Cloud’s boundary about being engaged with stakeholders. In a church context, the stakeholders are the board, staff, ministry leaders, and members. I was provoked to do better in this area of my ministry. Dr. Cloud described a time when the CEO of an organization on whose board he served invited him for lunch. In the discourse, the CEO humbly asked how he could serve the board better. Further, the CEO asked how Dr. Cloud thought he was doing and if there were areas that needed improvement. As I read this CEO’s questions, I felt in my heart that at my next pastorate, I must make this a habit. It is fearful to open the door for honest feedback, but in order to improve I need the assistance of other leaders to help me see any blind spots I may