Disadvantages Of Plea Bargaining

Improved Essays
A plea bargain is an agreement that the defendant will plead guilty to the original or another charge in return for some concession from the prosecutor (https://www.fbi.gov/resources/victim-assistance/a-brief-description-of-the-federal-criminal-justice-process). Some of the advantages of plea bargaining are that it helps move the cases through the system much quicker, therefore, it helps to de-clog the court system so that the focus could be on more serious offenses. The person that takes the plea bargain will get a lesser charge which will ultimately end with a lesser sentence. For a person that is facing any kind of criminal prosecution, taking a plea bargain can also take away the stress and the worry of a trial, or being found guilty. The …show more content…
The theory most commonly advanced with regards to regards to plea bargaining, derived from general bargaining theory, is that an agreement is easier when the parties have more information about what the consequences are of a proposed agreement (www.NCJRS.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/192517.pdf). If a person is in fact innocent, they may take a guilty plea because of the fear of being found guilty at a trial. In some cases, the victims or people that are affected by a crime may not feel that they have gotten the justice they deserved. Plea Bargains often times will cause for less thorough investigations and lazy prosecutions, because they expect that a plea agreement will be reached anyway. At times a plea is forced upon a person because it is simply easier for everyone involved. Some people may view plea bargains as being unconstitutional because, as American Citizens we have the Sixth Amendment which guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers ar and the nature of the charges and evidence against

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Defense counsels started to feel that defendants will not be able to pay for the time involved to go to trial, but the prosecutors feel even though they work harder at a trial they are not having to decide on a sentence in a plea bargain. The judges now have the burden to determine and announce all sentences to defendants. The ban on plea bargaining did not affect the sentences of violent crime charges, but it did drastically change the sentences of Felony 3 guilty outcomes. The defendants convicted of burglary, larceny and destruction of property found themselves receiving longer sentences.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many take the plea to get lower sentences. The defendants may have to live in prison and suffer from the label of felon. With the overwhelming caseloads, public defender do not have time to work thoroughly on the cases (Siegel, Schmalleger, and Worrall, 2017, p. 243). Public defenders should get more support staff to help in preparation of cases even though…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining has many benefits which is why it is so common in the United States criminal justice…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    William, I agree that bad faith bargaining is where the employer or union refuse to negotiate on collective bargaining. I think this wastes a lot of time when one of the parties isn’t willing to compromise on reaching an agreement. In fact, there are other ways an employer may try to bargain in bad faith. For example, an employer may try to incorporate an illegal subject of bargaining during negotiations. Although, it’s against the law, many employers still try to negotiate illegal subjects of bargaining.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining most often takes place before the beginning of a trial. It is the process by which the defendant and the prosecution work out a conclusion to the case, subject to court approval. For the prosecutor, the purpose of plea bargaining is to ensure a defendant gets punishment. For the defense, it is a way to get a lesser charge than if the case were to go to…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Using plea bargaining as a tool to expedite justice is not the most effective manner to handle such situation. After reading each case, I believe that pressuring the defendant only leads to the use of plea bargaining. A more thorough Investigation is to be done to determine the defendant’s culpability. Defendants are being pressured by their court-appoint lawyers. In the case of Erma Stewart, who situation left her pleading guilty for an offense not committed for a faster release.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plea Bargain Advantages

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages

    A plea bargain is when the defendant in a criminal trial agrees to plead guilty in the exchange of a lesser sentence or to have other charges dropped. In theory, a plea bargain is a way to speed up the courtroom process. When applied correctly plea bargains are excellent tools within the criminal justice system. Incorrectly used judgment is cast down from those outside of the criminal justice system.…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of coercion in plea bargains is constitutional according to the Supreme Court. Since plea-bargains for drug courts involve a greater need of coercion than normal court process due to the limited options available, it is considered a leveraging power to help drug users take advantage of the necessary treatment provided. However, the excessive use of coercion has led to many drug offenders entering treatment that are considered understaffed and over capacity (Parsons & Wei, 2015). The excessive use of coercion has also forced a drug courts to choice in behalf of the defendant, since the alternative is facing a jail sentence. Despite the concerns addressed, the courts when challenged of this claim find under the drug court setting that…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The numerical evidence for plea bargaining in the juvenile…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Making it much harder for a guilty plea to be tossed. This also brings into question his or her creditability, changing your statement after some time to think about it may seem odd to some. Changing a plea is easier done by the defendant, if he or she has favorable evidence against the prosecutors case. This evidence may be the lack of creditability the prosecutors main witness, DNA evidence or something that can confirm his or her…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being in law enforcement for several years I come across several suspects and defendants who expresses the criminal justice process moves like a snail and is always unpredictable. Imagine if a significant amount of cases was going to trial instead of over 90% of felony cases are plea bargained (Bohm, R., Haley, K.,n.d). Nevertheless, there are three types of plea bargains and prosecutors tend to have factors to decide if the plea bargain is in the best interest or what’s the better plea bargain to make depending on the situation. The first example, a defendant might plead guilty to trespass and a misdemeanor vandalism charge instead of burglary charge because burglary carries felony charges.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Evidence Interpretation

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Evidence Interpretation Over the years, there have been several cases that have been resolved with a false guilty plea or cases where a guilty party was not convicted of a crime. There are various elements that play a role in solving cases; evidence is a one of these key elements. Many factors can determine if the evidence submitted before a court of law is accurate such as how the evidence is collected, if proper protocell was followed before the laboratory’s handling of the evidence, and if the evidences was accurately processed by the crime scene laboratory by various forensic scientists. Furthermore, with the advances in technology in today’s society, various pieces of evidence such a DNA analysis have been considered a crucial element…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Improved conviction rates, ability to concentrate on perplexed cases, avoiding the trial and delays, are some of the pros of plea bargaining. The cons of plea bargaining are: The defendant could feel the need to take the plea; results in a different and lesser sentence; and it may pressure the innocent to plead guilty. There are many more pros and cons of plea bargaining that in time they could change. Some judges and attorneys do think this plea has taken the rights away of the defendants to have a trial. The plea bargain is like everything else in this world, take it or leave it.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States criminal justice system is made up of two models that criminals face concerning the sentencing phase of the courts. The two are indeterminate model and the determinate model. When you look at both of these models there are advantages and disadvantage that effect not only society but the criminals that are to fulfill the path of the models. The sentencing in the indeterminate model is formatted for rehabilitation of the inmate through his/her positive action while incarcerated. This positive rehabilitation sets up the end result of being released from the sentencing imposed for the crime.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics