Comparing Alexander Hamilton And Thomas Jefferson's Republican-Republican

Superior Essays
In American history, few ideological disagreements have been as important as the divide between Alexander Hamilton 's Federalist Party and Thomas Jefferson 's Democrat-Republicans. Both parties were led by brilliant men whose political arguments would lay the foundation for debates on the nature of government in America that are ever present in our national discourse. Hamilton thought America should drive ahead into the future as an industrial and mercantile powerhouse, whereas Thomas Jefferson felt that America 's greatness lied in the "yeoman farmer" and the agrarian traditions he represented. Both sought the best path forward for the young American nation and both would have a chance to put their theories to the test in their capacities as ministers in the Washington Administration and later, in Jefferson 's case, as President. In order to fully understand and appreciate their arguments, a detailed analysis of the two men’s backgrounds which helped shape their ideas regarding national power and state governments, and the creation of a national banking system will be presented herein. Both men had different family backgrounds, but shared some similarities, Jefferson born into wealth and attended some of the finest schools in colonial America. His father was a planter and a slave holder he had “obtained more than one thousand acres along the Rivanna River, and he soon added four hundred more.” (pg. 3 Jefferson vs. Hamilton). Growing up in a slave owning household, Jefferson had slaves and continued to own them far into his adult life. However, he later sought to abolish slavery, but the irony or hypocrisy of the fact that he owned slaves till the day he died somehow escaped him. He claimed “slavery was contrary to natural law and existed only because of unenlightened monarchs or wicked legislatures.” (pg. 12 Jefferson vs Hamilton). He explained how slaves deserved their freedom and it needed to be given back to them because, they were born with rights therefore could not be owned. He believed “Once Slavery was abolished, as he thought it must be, slaves would regain their natural status as free people.” (pg. 12 Jefferson vs Hamilton). Many people agreed with Jefferson and favored the idea of abolishing slavery, but others disagreed and wanted to continue owning slaves and selling them. Jefferson was very fortunate as he was born into wealth and had an easy life because; he had everything given to him whereas Hamilton was not so fortunate. Hamilton, however, had to work for his education as he was not as fortunate as Jefferson. He was not born into a wealth family he actually did not have much support from his parents he was called “the bastard child of a Scotch pedlar” by John Adams (pg. 216 The American Promise). After his mother died Hamilton gained experience in business and finance. Hamilton was opposed to tyrant leaders and oppressive leaders he wanted the people to be free of that type of ruling. Hamilton was viewed as a man who “lusted for personal as well as national power” (Pg. 42 Jefferson vs. Hamilton). Hamilton was opposed to tyrant leaders yet he lusted for personal power as well as national power. Eventually all that power could have gone to his head …show more content…
However there were some things he was opposed to with the formation of the Constitution. One aspect Jefferson strongly disliked was abandoning the idea of rotation in the office especially of the president. Jefferson states “The first magistrate will always be re-elected if the constitution permits it…. He is then an officer for life.” (Pg. 23 Jefferson vs Hamilton). Jefferson did not like the idea that a president should be re-elected several times, he preferred that the President should be allowed to serve only for a few terms. Like he states, if permitted by the constitution that person is an officer for life, because he can continuously be re-elected. Although he wanted a government he feared the idea of the government having too much power seeing that it could lead to monarchy. “Jefferson expressed his fear that monarchial Federalists sought to use the new government as a stepping stone to monarchy.” (Pg. 78 Jefferson vs Hamilton). With this Jefferson made an alignment with the Democrat-Republican party with the wishes to ensure the people taxing rights as well as their natural

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Michael Vipond Mr. Haindfield APUSH 1 November 2017 Unit 6 Reaction Paper In the 1780s and 1790s, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton had vastly different ideas on how the economic future would be for the United States. Both of them envisioned a prominent nation, but with both different ideas on how to get there. Despite Jefferson’s view of a future of agricultural economy, which was based on farming, no national bank, and strong state governments; Hamiltons view of an industrial economy, which was based on manufacturing, a national bank, and a strong national government, prospered. The extent in which each of their visions affected the United States were reflected by strikes done in the labor work force, the repeal of the national bank by Andrew Jackson, and the growing number of textiles in the U.S. between 1810 and 1840.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However ideas change along with time and the Presidents may have to alter their beliefs to keep the nation stable. Although the administrations of President Thomas Jefferson and President James Madison attempted to stick to…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As is today, unfortunatley a politiians general belief may conflict with what they "know" is the right thing to do in the situation. Take the Louisiana Purchase by Jefferson. We see earlier that unless the Constitution stated a power was specifically granted to the federal government, it would be transfered to the state. However, at this time, Jefferson as president, was altering treaties and ultimately buying land when he himself admitted it was unconstitutional in private. Jefferson believed in the land so much that he knew his contradiction would not be as powerful as the production of the newly acquired…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The legacy of Thomas Jefferson is one which had set the stage for the Unites States government and the manner in which the procession of politics was conducted. His prominence in American history is matched by his willingness and dedication towards ensuring the success and stability of the fledgling nation. The issue many opponents of Thomas Jefferson hold against him was his inability or willingness to take a stance and stick with it, often acquiescing to demands of his political adversaries. Supporters of Thomas Jefferson state his actions were necessary for the proper facilitation and stability in the critical, early years of the American Democratic process. Thomas Jefferson’s role and impact on American politics set certain standards…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1791, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton argued for what they thought would be most beneficial for America. Hamilton, influenced by England's financial system, proposed to establish a National Bank (http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu). As a Federalist, he wanted a strong, centralized government with a financial system to operate different branches of America. He believed in commerce and manufacturing, wanting to raise tariffs and promote government development. On the other hand, Jefferson opposed the bank idea, believing in self-sufficient agriculture and freedom in a rural society (http://www.let.rug.nl).…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reading passage describes the views of a Republican, Thomas Jefferson, who served as the secretary of state under George Washington administration and the listening passage presents the perspective of a Federalist, Alexander Hamilton, who served as the secretary of treasury under the same administration. Both the reading and the listening passage describes the path a young US should take and these paths differ radically between Jefferson and Hamilton. One way that Jefferson and Hamilton disagreed was on the basis of economy. Jefferson believed that the US should remain agrarian economy.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jefferson and Adams would disapprove on many things, everything was an argument between them. They spent most of their political lives debating, disagreeing, and arguing with each other. Adams…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also believed a national bank would be corrupt and should be avoided. Jefferson thought a strong national government would be dangerous to the people’s protection and security. He thought government needed to be watched closely and cut in its…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The election of 1800 was the first time the federal government had submitted its power and truly gave into democracy and more importantly laid the framework of how an election should be ran. In his address Jefferson’s passion for differing viewpoints is shown when he said “...every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle. We have called by different names brethren of the same principle. We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists . If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it".…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is often the case in revolutions that many partnerships who take a lead role in shaping a new society do not continue to work together after their goal is achieved, that is exactly what happened to James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, who had risen to prominent positions within the new nation of America as delegates for their respective state. Both would be each other 's support for fighting for a new and ratified U.S. constitution. Although their partnership falls apart, they are truly America’s most needed partnership. Madison and Hamilton together led the U.S. to create and ratify the U.S. Constitution, which gave people more rights, made everyone more equal, and set the path for a self-governing America. James Madison and Alexander…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were two men who wanted change in the political party system. This is where the two new political parties were created, the Federalist party and the Democratic-Republicans. These two new forms of government brought new and different ideas on how to run a federal government. Most candidates of today still follow these ways of thinking, but their ideals are much less extreme, but also these ideas could be applied to some of the problems of today. Alexander Hamilton started his political career as an advisor to Washington during his presidency.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Alexander Hamilton, a political tyrant of the 1790s, gave Thomas Jefferson no other recourse but to form his own political party to oppose the Federalist Party’s repressive policies.” This historian’s interpretation of Alexander Hamilton and the Federalist Party is biased and not factual. Hamilton was not a political “tyrant.” However, he was a strong-willed and obstinate individual. In addition, the Federalist Party did not have “repressive” policies.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hamilton wanted a America full of business men, bankers, financiers. Jefferson’s vision was more of a democratic prospect. He spoke for the southern planter Federalists. He had optimism for the agricultural nation for the small, independent farmers. He was restrained on domestic matters.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Jefferson’s view for America’s future was the complete opposite of Hamilton’s. Jefferson believed that the United States should be an agricultural society with government concentrated on the state and local level. Jefferson was one of the most influential Founding Fathers as he was the writer of the Declaration of Independence. It was because of Jefferson’s intellect and prominence in the Southern states that George Washington appointed to him as the nation’s first Secretary of State. It was in Washington’s cabinet that much of the nation’s differing views of government and politics came to a head.…

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In defence to this Hamilton enforced the idea that if the office holder was deemed irresponsible, removal from office would be supported. Jefferson was in complete opposition to this, as he stated if one man was to be put in executive order, trouble was destined to occur. He believed that the executive power should consist of a single man and his office, to allow for the regulation of the single man. The conclusion drawn was a split between both Hamilton’s views and Jefferson’s views, “a single executive of limited…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays