Short-Answer Banneker believed that Jefferson was being a hypocrite. Jefferson wrote “all men are created equal,” but still allowed slavery to persist in the United States.
Benjamin Franklin would question Banneker’s view. Benjamin Franklin was a strong advocate for colonial unity, and slavery was an issue that would have prevented colonial unity had it been abolished. So, therefore, Benjamin Franklin would view the issue of slavery as less important than the issue of colonial unity, which was weak at the time. Jefferson would have agreed with Banneker’s argument that slavery must not be continued in the United States. However, Jefferson would have believed that the nation was still too reliant on slaves in their economy for it to be abolished and that it was simply not an ideal time for them to abolish slavery because the unity of the colonies was just freshly acquired and agreed to. Even then, there were still problems each colony …show more content…
He believes that men are answerable for any publication of false accounts, and allowing them to think that they are not will end in disaster.
Albert Gallatin believes that the Sedition Act is designed to keep a certain party in power and allow them to oppress the other. He believes that there should be no restriction on the circulation of opinion.
In the Peter Zenger trial, he was accused of printing libel, in which he criticized the British government. In Gallatin’s argument, he believes there should be freedom of the press. The Peter Zenger trial scored a huge victory towards acquiring freedom of the press and allowing colonists to circulate their opinions about the British government. As seen during the American Revolution, freedom of the press was essential when combating the British. Since the Zenger trial was a move towards freedom of the press, it supports Gallatin’s argument that there should be freedom the
Benjamin Franklin would question Banneker’s view. Benjamin Franklin was a strong advocate for colonial unity, and slavery was an issue that would have prevented colonial unity had it been abolished. So, therefore, Benjamin Franklin would view the issue of slavery as less important than the issue of colonial unity, which was weak at the time. Jefferson would have agreed with Banneker’s argument that slavery must not be continued in the United States. However, Jefferson would have believed that the nation was still too reliant on slaves in their economy for it to be abolished and that it was simply not an ideal time for them to abolish slavery because the unity of the colonies was just freshly acquired and agreed to. Even then, there were still problems each colony …show more content…
He believes that men are answerable for any publication of false accounts, and allowing them to think that they are not will end in disaster.
Albert Gallatin believes that the Sedition Act is designed to keep a certain party in power and allow them to oppress the other. He believes that there should be no restriction on the circulation of opinion.
In the Peter Zenger trial, he was accused of printing libel, in which he criticized the British government. In Gallatin’s argument, he believes there should be freedom of the press. The Peter Zenger trial scored a huge victory towards acquiring freedom of the press and allowing colonists to circulate their opinions about the British government. As seen during the American Revolution, freedom of the press was essential when combating the British. Since the Zenger trial was a move towards freedom of the press, it supports Gallatin’s argument that there should be freedom the