Differentiate Morals From Ethics Essay

Superior Essays
STUDENT ID – 17460
1. Differentiate Morals from Ethics.
Morality can be defined as the principles of people’s lives which they follow for right and wrong things. In other words, ‘morality’ is meant the standards of rightness and the ways through people can judge human behaviours. Morals deal with culturally transmitted standards of right and wrong. According to my opinion, morals show one’s actions are good in some way. Morality is the distinction between right and wrong. There are number of definitions for morality from past to present. Some definitions are given in forthcoming lines.
Based on “Webster New World Dictionary of American Language”, moral is thing that related with skill to decide right and wrong of behaviour that accepted by all people. According to Stemberg (1994-938), morality refers to concern with what is good or right in people’s relationships with each other. A key to understand morality is to be clean understanding of good (or bad) and right (or wrong). Following are the some examples of morality in society: 1) Do not gossip 2) Tell the truth 3) Do not vandalize property 4) Have courage Ethics involves the systematic study of right and wrong behaviour. It means to do the right things. Historically, the term ‘ethics’ comes from Greek ‘ethos’ which means the customs, habits and more of people. According to the Theory of Boundless “Defining Ethics” Boundless Management Boundless, (21 July, 2015) “ethics are the set of principles that guide a person’s behaviour. These morals shaped by social and cultural practicing and religious influences. Ethics reflect believes about what is right, what is unjust, what is good, and what is bad in terms of human behaviour”. They serve as a compass to direct how people should behave towards each other, understand and achieve their obligations. Since both deal with right and wrong, there is not much difference in these but basically ethics is the study of morals. “Ethics and morals both look same but these two are completely different from each other. It means, it may be ethical for someone to consume alcohol, after all there is no rule or code for it but at the same time the same person may got a job in alcohol firm. This implies that ethics define the code that a society or group of people follow the morality to get into right and wrong at a much deeper level, which is both personal and spiritual. The ethics that a person follows are impacted upon by external resources like the nations, society, religion and profession and could change with a change in any of these resources” as this is cleat at “DifferenceBetween” website (www.Differencebetween.net/business/difference-between-ethics-and-morals/). For instance fox hunting in England was ethical till the other day, because that was the tradition and there was no law against it. But the recent laws banning it as illegal, and the widespread protests against the evil nature of sport caused a cessation of the tradition supporting it, and therefore it became unethical. Morals on other hand are made of sterner stuff, and usually do not change. It will for instance always immoral to murder another human being, no matter who the person
…show more content…
The artificial identification of our own interests with others means that human beings always act in such a way that promotes the general happiness as this would provide the benefits to all people for long term.
Types of Utilitarianism
Jeremy Bentham divides utilitarianism into different forms as given below:
1. Act Utilitarianism
This is the simplest and straight-forward type. Act utilitarianism advices us to judge each individual action from its outcome only. If it is a choice between two different actions, we are obliged to take the one which would provide the most happiness for most people.
The main problem with this is that it could permit some illegal or wrong acts such as employing 40 child labourers in India to make cheaper product for a cloth company in USA, the profit for the great number of shareholders in the company would be greatly increased.
2. Rule Utilitarianism
Rule Utilitarianism is not concerned with individually acts but with the utility of rule for action. It means judge an act in such a way so everyone should obey this ruke.
3. Negative

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative philosophy of ethics that has been around since the late eighteenth century. It earliest proponents were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The general idea of utilitarianism is that there is no morality measurement except results. So, when one is deciding how to act, the only thing that matters is what the results of the actions are. Utilitarianism says that the actions that cause the most happiness and the least amount of unhappiness or pain are the moral acts.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    J.D. Stroube wrote in Caged by Damnation that, “Life is filled with unanswered questions, but it is the courage to seek those answers that continues to give meaning to life. You can spend your life wallowing in despair, wondering why you were the one who was led towards the road strewn with pain, or you can be grateful that you are strong enough to survive it.” One of the unanswered questions I have had to contemplate these past nine weeks is, “Are humans inherently good or bad?” To answer this question many others come about like, “Is morality due to the influence of society or was society only created as a guideline to our morality.” Morals are a person's standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee discusses tough moral topics like racism and prejudice views, through the eyes of a child. The character Scout demonstrates a child’s obligation to pursue morality. But a child’s moral obligations depend on their moral foundation. Because children are naïve, they see situations ingenuously, unlike adults imbued with prejudice or racist ideas. Because Scout is a child she has that sense of naivety but can be more accountable for what she does because of the moral foundation.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Definition of Morally Bad and Morally Good Morality denotes the assortment or classification of concepts of right and wrong behaviors. On the one hand, actions are regarded morally right if they raise the comfort of the individuals who are affected by them. Oppositely, actions are regarded morally wrong if they lessen the comfort of the…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people disagree with the meaning of morality. Morality is known as the separation between good and evil. The line can easily be blurred because what one person believes to be bad another person could believe is good due to the way they were raised. Every character has moments in the book where they are immoral but some more so than others.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism Utilitarianism principles support the idea that decisions must be based on what will benefit the largest number of people. Each person’s actions are added to the overall utility of the community impacted by those actions. Utilitarianism is focus on the net result of their actions instead of the means or motives that generated the reason for their actions. It is doing by intrinsic rewards which the personal satisfaction from benefiting others.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is centered around the idea that the right action is the one that promotes the most utility, otherwise known as happiness. Because of this, utilitarianism is grounded in the foundational value of happiness. All instrumental values derive their worth from foundational values; therefore, anything that promotes happiness is valuable. Foundational values can explain other prescriptive claims or value claims. Under utilitarianism, any claims that are correctly made are those that are grounded in happiness and promote the most utility.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A: It is the discipline concerned with what is morally good and bad, right and wrong. The term is also applied to any system or theory of moral values or principles. Q: Why do ethics vary from person to person?…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Act utilitarianism is a form of utilitarianism that says that an action is right if and only if it produces the greatest amount of happiness, and wrong if it produces more unhappiness than happiness than any other possible outcome. Act utilitarianism says that when faced with a situation one must look at the possible consequences, and act upon the one that you think will bring the most amount of happiness. The problem with act utilitarianism is as follows; this view will justify actions such as lying, and breaking the law in some situations if the outcome bring the greatest amount of happiness. If one is on a situation where you have to kill one person in order to safe 10 others, act utilitarianism would say that on this situation it is ok to kill that one person because it would bring the greatest overall happiness.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rule Utilitarianism

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stealing to survive How would a utilitarian respond to the dilemma of stealing to survive? Utilitarianism is a normative theory and a teleological approach to morality. The theory states that motives do not matter and that the consequences are the only thing that should make you carry out an act. The foundation of utilitarianism is the Greatest Happiness Principle which has three sections.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is considered as one of the most prominent philosophical concepts. This model's core perspective emphasizes that actions are ethically acceptable or unacceptable depending on their consequences. Based on this understanding, it can be argued that utilitarians hold that the goal of morality is to improve life by enhancing some favorable things such as happiness in the world while minimizing undesirable aspects such as grief (Urmson, 33). Consequently, the core objective of this essay is to define and critique both Act and Rule Utilitarianism, as well as determine the most practical kind of utilitarianism.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because rule utilitarianism relies on moral rules to determine the permissibility of actions, it has the resources to avoid the problems act utilitarianism faces concerning individual rights by establishing rules that prohibit infringement of individual rights. For instance, one should not enslave others because, in most instances, slavery has more negative outcomes than not enslaving others. Therefore if not enslaving others was a rule, rule utilitarianism would consider all slavery immoral, regardless if individual cases of slavery would yield more good outcomes. In more instances than not, violating individual rights results in a lower utility, therefore, the majority of moral rules align with our individual rights and intuitive moral verdicts. Thus, rule utilitarianism has the resources to prohibit the problems that act utilitarianism faces concerning infringement of individual rights.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of an action. Endowing to the classical utilitarian moral theory, we classify human acts or practices as we consider neither the nature of the acts or practices nor the motive for which people do what they do. This can harvest to one’s action; that a life conceivably is saved, which matters morally. There is no total distinction between what is right and what is wrong based on Bentham’s view, only if the consequences are the highest favorable for the person’s greatest happiness, even including the majority of the people related to this person who is responsible to give that action. Drawing a conclusion about utilitarianism, it is our duty to decide which action or practice is best by considering the likely or actual consequences of each substitute.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality is a particular system of values and principles of conduct held by one person or society. Each person has their own set of morals, and they can be influenced by things such as culture or other people. There is no universally right moral value system, and as far as morals go, there is no right or wrong. In The Book Thief by Markus Zusak, a man named Adolf Hitler persuaded the citizens of Germany that jewish people were a threat to their society. Adolf Hitler took control over Germany and established his Nazi government.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism states that good is what brings the most happiness to people. Mill also believes that people are not satisfied with just physical pleasures, but they strive to achieve pleasure of the mind as well. There are two main types of utilitarianism including act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of specific actions of a human person in a particular situation and rule utilitarianism suggests that the principle of utility can be used to generate and test rules can be employed is similar situations. The assumption is that if we follow a set of rules that give us the best consequences our actions will result in the greater good for everyone around us.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics