Death Penalty In Australia Essay

Improved Essays
As a human being the death penalty being enforced back into Australian society would mean a large number of death in our country and impact myself greatly. Personally thinking about the way it would make families learn to deal with the death of their loved ones, does not sound like one step closer to a brighter future. “The death toll rises” would not be a surprise for a newspaper headline anymore after death would be an option to deal with criminals. People would fear for the repercussions. These repercussions would include rioting if a man who was wrongfully convicted, was sentenced to death and families rampaging after a lost son or daughter, sister or brother. Is the death penalty really worth the possibility of this?

The Australian legislation states:
“A person is not liable to the punishment of death for any offence referred to in subsection 3(2).”

“(2) This Act applies in relation to, and in relation to offences under, the laws of the Commonwealth and of the Territories, and, to the extent to which the powers of the Parliament permit, in relation to, and in relation to offences under, Imperial Acts.”

Taken from the Death Penalty Abolition Act of 1973.

The Federal Register of Legislation holds this act on their website in public view. If you stand back and think
…show more content…
If we were to follow under the United States of America’s guidance when applying for a death penalty, we would also be applying for a tax increase. If a felon is convicted and sentenced to jail time, the cost of such act impacts the wallet of the government at around $740,000 (USD). Now that the cost of a conviction to jail time is established, the real home-hitting fact follows the $1.26 million (USD) cost of a death sentence. In the USA taxpayers are paying more than $90,000 for the convenience of death row inmates. There are only 714 inmates on death row.

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Those who oppose to the death penalty also claim that such a punishment would have no effect on those who live to kill. People who wish to commit a heinous act such as a mass killing or bombing would have no fears of what the repercussions would be. This is also true for serial killers because “living murderers, in prison, after release or escape, are much more likely to harm and murder, again,” (Parks, 2010, pg 75). Although this is the case, in Canada, the main goal of the criminal justice system is to rehabilitate criminals and return them to society. If we were to execute the convicts, it effectively takes away all chances of ever rehabilitating…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Mandated Equal Funding Ethical? Is it ethical that some children have more funding and better opportunities than others? Freddy Simmons, Jason Riggins, Jose Martinez, Gloria Renteria, Jessica Remy, Jamal Jones attended high school in East Detroit, MI until each of them dropped out. East Detroit is one of the more poverty-stricken cities in America with the highest welfare rates therefore little to no property tax revenue for funding it’s K-12 public school system. Just a few towns away is Bloomfield Hills, MI that spends double per pupil on their students.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To keep one prisoner on the death row costs $90,000 for the United States taxpayers. Cases without capital punishment involved cost up to $740,000, while $1.26 million is spent in cases where the death penalty is present. It not only for a moral cause, but also for the costs it takes to go through the death penalty process. It is understandable that governments find this sort of punishments a way to maintain the safety of their population, it has not been as effective as it should…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Capital punishment in Australia has been abolished in all jurisdictions. Queensland got rid of the death penalty in 1922 as did Tasmania in 1968, The federal government dismissed the death penalty in 1973, also in the Australian capital territory and the northern territory. Victoria also decided to do the same getting rid of capital punishment in 1975, new south wales rid of the death penalty for murder in 1955, and then for all crimes in 1985.…

    • 76 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are currently five non-fatal offences against the person which are contained within two statutes, namely the Criminal Justice Act (CJA) 1988 and the Offences Against the Person’s Act (OAPA) 1861, as well as being developed within common law. Firstly the law is not codified under one piece of legislation. As the law of non-fatal offences against the person cannot be found within one statute – this makes the law unnecessarily complex. This complexity can be hard for the jury to understand as the OAPA 1861 doesn’t clearly establish what must be proven for each offence which is undemocratic, unconstitutional and goes against the separation of powers but also doesn’t make any clear reference to the Mens Rea (MR) of a crime.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the twenty first century there has been a considerable amount of discussion debating whether or not the death penalty, the act of sentencing someone to death as punishment for a crime, should be re-introduced into Australia’s modern society. In these disputes people attempt to argue that the death penalty should be brought back as it is a deterrent against crime, however evidence proves that the death penalty should not be reintroduced into Australias society as it is cruel and inhumane Such evidence is outlined in the history of the death penalty, in the rise of executions of our neighbouring countries which still up hold the death penalty and even in the many cases where people have had the human rights violated and have been falsely accused…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1992, Cameron Todd Willingham was convicted of arson and murder that caused the deaths of his three children. In 2004, he was given capital punishment. According to the Texas Forensic Science Commission, it was demonstrated that the evidence had been misinterpreted, and that none of the evidence that had previously been used against Willingham was valid. The new evidence showed that the fire was accidental. As a society, we should not allow capital punishment to be legal in the United States.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Punishment

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty is appropriate in deterrence of that criminal that they will not commit again. The death penalty is also deterrence for those wanting to know the consequences of their actions and if the legal system imposed the death penalty on all murder crimes then murder rates would fall. The death penalty is just that and that’s what it was put in place for is to deter others from committing the same crime. By allowing states to abolish the death penalty then we are allowing for more murders and more crime to be committed because the fear of death is now…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Australia should not have the death penalty for people who commit murder. Do you think Australia should have a death penalty? Well, I certainly don't. I believe we shouldn't have a death penalty in Australia because it can lead to people paying for crimes they did not commit also it does not prevent crimes and people have the right to live. As they say, 2 wrongs don't make a right.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, the death penalty cost over 180 million just to kill 5 people with the electric chair. That money ends up being paid back by regular people’s tax money. Bear in mind that the death penalty takes away a person’s life though it doesn’t help anyone does…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Essay

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When one thinks about the death penalty, they should imagine someone committing a horrific crime, such as murder. However, race plays a significant role in death penalty cases. It’s evident that if one is on trial for committing murder and they are found guilty, most likely they will face jail time no matter the color of their skin. It’s also evident when determining if one will face the death penalty if the defendant is African American. In my opinion, anyone who commits a horrific crime should face their consequences, but the consequences shouldn 't be tougher for people of color.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the Death Penalty be Re-introduced in the UK? The capital punishment in the U.K. has now been abolished for just less than 50 years. It was abolished on the 9th November 1965 with the last execution being performed on the 7th April 1964 on Gwynne Evans and Peter Allen for brutally killing the unfortunate John Alan West when they tried to rob him. Since that time many people have looked back and wondered if the Government made the right decision. This is a highly controversial topic, even today and so in this project I hope to look at both sides of the argument and from different angles.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The financial cost of the death penalty is one that is far greater than the cost of any other sentence. There are many things that drive the cost of the death penalty up that are not present in cases that end in a different sentence. Source A points out a few of the largest components to…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Not to mention it offers closure to the families involved, along with being a deterrent to crime. Committing a heinous crime, whether premeditated or not; such a treason, terrorism, or murder, are just a few crimes that will be given the death…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A study of Los Angeles County trials has shown that the average trial in which prosecutors demand the death penalty costs $1,898,323, while a murder trial where the death penalty is not sought comes in at $627,322. Death penalty is the most expensive because the constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for any capital cases. The process is required to make sure that innocent men and women are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and also to protect the innocent person from getting executed. According to George Sjostrom, “The cost of the death penalty is too high, both in dollars and in emotional pain,” (192). If we replace the death penalty with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole, it will cost millions less and also ensures that the public is safe and protected and we will also eliminate the risk of…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays