Through the scientific approach was accepted that the estimated treatments did not weaken the use and support for some of the supplementary controversial CAM treatments. Therefore, individuals who follow the scientific norm, are claiming that it is not a considerable evidence from randomised controlled trials. It has not been cleared, whether such disagreement includes the public views. A data from 2009 Welcome Monitor survey has been used to study public beliefs and the influence of controversial CAM, homeopathy within the United Kingdom. The result suggested that over 40% of the British public had supportive analysis for homeopathy and conventional medicine at once. However, Explanatory analyses revealed that simultaneous support for a controversial CAM treatment and conventional medicine with a lack of scientific knowledge including the concern about the medical research
Through the scientific approach was accepted that the estimated treatments did not weaken the use and support for some of the supplementary controversial CAM treatments. Therefore, individuals who follow the scientific norm, are claiming that it is not a considerable evidence from randomised controlled trials. It has not been cleared, whether such disagreement includes the public views. A data from 2009 Welcome Monitor survey has been used to study public beliefs and the influence of controversial CAM, homeopathy within the United Kingdom. The result suggested that over 40% of the British public had supportive analysis for homeopathy and conventional medicine at once. However, Explanatory analyses revealed that simultaneous support for a controversial CAM treatment and conventional medicine with a lack of scientific knowledge including the concern about the medical research