Consequentialism And Utilitarianism In Garrett Hardin's Lifeboat Ethics

Improved Essays
Ethics is the philosophical study of morality. In other words, it is the study of what is wrong and right, good or bad. Humanity has been intrigued with the answer to these subject matters for hundreds of years. In that time there have been several philosophers such as Aristotle who have formulated moral theories like Virtue ethics. Not all of these theories are put in practice today but they do help in the solving of moral issues. One such experiment which has been brought about by the ecologist Garrett Hardin, is called Lifeboat Ethics. It presents the following situation which happens on a lifeboat after a shipwreck in the middle of the ocean:

"So here we sit, say 50 people in our lifeboat. To be generous, let us assume it has room for
…show more content…
Essentially, consequentialist moral theories are concerned with the consequences of actions. That is, what makes an action right is the consequences it will bring about for everyone. On the other hand, Nonconsequentialist theories are not concerned with the consequences of actions but with the nature of the actions, this is what nonconsequentialists look at when judging whether an action is right or wrong. The theories in discussion can then be categorized as such. Both Utilitarianism ans Ethical Egoism fall under Consequentialist theories because their main focus are consequences. On the other hand, Divine Command Theory, Kantian Ethics and Natural Law all fall under Nonconsequentialist theories because their main focus is the nature of …show more content…
According to Vaughn egoism tells the people on the boat to do what will bring the best outcome for themselves. In other words, helping probably does not sound like something and egoist would do in this situation at all. If the egoists on the boat were to have another ten people jump on the boat then that means that there would be less rations for the fifty people who are already sitting on the boat. On the other hand, if the egoists were to actually let another ten people on the boat they would choose whoever would eat less, need the least attention, occupy the least amount of room and whoever is the most able to help in this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics, he emphasizes on the ethical issue of how to judiciously help the poor and the argument behind it. In the beginning of the essay Hardin responds to the comparison of Earth as a spaceship, by stating that it can be dangerous when used by misguided idealists to justify suicidal policies for sharing our resources through uncontrolled immigration and foreign aid. Interestingly enough, he prefers to address the issue with a lifeboat metaphor, in which refers to the rich nations (such as the United States) as being aboard the boat, as well as the poor nations who are swimming around the boats for…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Birth of HeLa What are your initial thoughts when the word ethics is mentioned? Some ideas that come to mind most likely may be guidelines, rules, behavioral conduct, the difference between what is acceptable or unacceptable, or simply just some type of establishment between what is right and what is wrong. Ethics is defined as the system or code of conduct and morals advocated by a particular individual or group (Towsley-Cook & Young, 2007). In The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, a beautiful, uneducated, African American tobacco farmer developed cervical cancer from which cell samples were taken during her treatment.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Utilitarianism is based on the consequences resulting from actions. Moral actions solely rely on the resulting consequences. Pleasures vary regarding quality and quantity. However, utilitarianism theory gives the quality aspect an upper hand. “Human beings are not satisfied with pleasures they have because they consider them to be of low quality” (Rosen, 2005.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor” Selfishness is exposed by Durning’s “Asking How Much Is Enough” In the short essay “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor” Garrett Hardin argues that the planet faces the problem of overpopulation. He suggest nations should stop helping the poor before the overpopulation kills everyone. He advises the wealthy to protect their resources and leave those who cannot to fend for themselves.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Choosing the right passengers. In the passage the lifeboat you are asked to choose 10 poor people swimming in water to save. The lifeboat holds up to 60 people and 50 seats are already taken by the wealthy. How do you choose what passengers to let in the boat? How can you put a value on another person life and how does society view the rich vs the poor?…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Prima Facie Immigrates

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The second term that I will bring up while discussing this topic is consequentialism. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines this term as, “the theory that the value and especially the moral value of an act should be judged by the value of its consequences.” I feel that the rest of the terms or phrases that I will use in this paper are going to be simple enough that they do not need any…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hardin vs. Swift Both Garrett Hardins Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor and Jonathan Swifts A Modest Proposal provide arguments of economic in equality religious satire and cultural arrogance. Both Hardin and Swift give arguments of why we are to be our brother’s keeper in a world where population is out of control and greed and self-preservation is a motivating factor. Hardin describes economic inequality as a population of the world in life boats. The rich and elite have first seating in the rest of the world is left to tread water.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, proximity should not be the deciding factor on who to help. Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: the Case against the Poor,” argues that help to the poor should not be given (Hardin, 1974, pp.566-567). Hardin provides an analogy that supports his argument; there are 50 people on a lifeboat with 10 more empty spots, however if a new plant disease breaks out or the weather decimates the population, there should be excess food provided on the lifeboat (Hardin, 1974, pp.566). If the lifeboat encounters 100 swimmers, there are 3 ways to deal with this issue: (1) by the Christian ideal if everyone is let in then the boat will drown, (2) let ten people in, but who?, the ten neediest or the best ten?, etc. or (3) don’t admit anyone to the boat which ensures survival to those who are already on in the Lifeboat (Hardin, 1974, pp.566). Due to scarce resources (as seen…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Poverty, poor, and overpopulation are becoming major issues in today 's society. As time goes by, it becomes awfully clear that these issues are problems we must deal with. While many want to address and solve these issues, there tends to be a divide on how to do so. There are many papers available concerning this problem. The two I find to have the strongest arguments are actually quite contradicting.…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A. Utilitarianism seeks to maximize good by minimizing harm to all while egoism seeks to maximize good by keeping the individual happy. As ethical egoism holds that moral conduct ought to be judged through self-interest. Egoism states that the good consequences for the individual agent outweigh the consequences placed upon…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, Hardin argues about “a world that must solve real and pressing problems of overpopulation, hunger and moral duty.” Hardin sets the stage by first giving his analysis on the structure of the world today by describing the earth as a lifeboat rather than a spaceship. He then dives into how population control, the tragedy of the commons and immigration are some of the main reasons for the problems we have today. Hardin argues that simply helping people and giving charitably will not solve these problems. Peter Singer, in “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” seemingly goes against Hardin by saying that “if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I will argue that act consequentialism is the most plausible moral theory because it better summarizes my thought process when making a decision. Act consequentialism is interchangeably used with classical act utilitarianism. This theory states that you ought to do whatever will produce the best (or least bad) overall consequences. Some phrases an act consequentialist would use is “The greatest good for the greatest number” or “The ends justify the means”. These phrases just emphasize that as long as the end results maximize the best consequences, then you should do what requires you to get those results.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction: In the article “Living on a Lifeboat,” Garrett Hardin believes that our obligations to the poor and hungry are metaphors based on the ethics of living on a lifeboat and the tragedy of the common. The ethics of living on lifeboat is based upon the rich and the poor. Rich people are in the lifeboat and poor people are in the sea. The wealthy has only three options in the situation with the poor people.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To fully understand how normative principles, justify morality, they must be broken down. We will begin with consequentialism, which is a future-oriented family of theories. Consequentialism states that actions are morally right just because…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism V. Pragmatism Over many centuries, ethics helped build the foundation of the laws we abide by today. Ethics are moral principles that control a person’s behavior/actions. Ethics is also known as moral philosophy, which is a branch of philosophy that rises up questions about morality. For instances, questions like is it good or bad, right or wrong, justice or crime.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays