Essay On Indian Caste System

Improved Essays
How did the Indian Caste system differ from the organization of Chinese society?

Both China and India used systems that divided people into classes, they both differed however. In the caste system, a person’s caste is hereditary, with attaining a higher caste being almost impossible within a lifetime. The caste system is also very expansive, containing over “300 jati (or livings), which became further divided into a multitude of subcastes” (56). On the other hand, China’s class system was not hereditary and upward mobility was uncommon due to lack of wealth and/or talent. China’s class system also was much less complex, only consisting of about three social groups. Overall, the Indian caste system is much more strict and complex than the class system that developed in China.

Compare the social and family structures of India and China in the Classical period. What are the main differences? The main similarities?

Though the organization of India and China was mostly different, the family structures were similar. The caste system in India was very strict, inherited, virtually unchangeable, and complex. China had a class system that was less strict, also inherited, difficult (but not impossible) to change, and extremely simple compared to India. However, both taught the idea that a person should act according to their social status. In terms of family structure, both societies were almost the same. In both societies, women and children were encouraged to obey their husband/father, as he was the leader of the family. However, China allowed a disobedient child to be punished (or even killed, in some cases), while India encouraged parents to pamper their children. Conclusively, China and India had different social structures, but similar family structures. What were the main similarities and differences between Greek and Roman political structures? While the early Roman republic was more similar to the direct democracy of Athens, the later Roman empire was different from the city-states of Greece.
…show more content…
During the republic, Roman citizens would elect officials, similar to directly voting for laws as in Athens. Despite the slight difference, both societies encouraged active participation in the government and military. However, as Rome became an empire, the senate turned into a “rather meaningless forum for debates” (76). Even more so, though a good amount of the states remained with local autonomy, the emperor and his officials still possessed a great deal of power. Overall, the Roman republic was much more similar to the Greek city-states than the Roman Empire. Compare the main features of the social structure of the classical civilizations in the Mediterranean, China, and India. To compare the social structures of the classical civilizations in the Mediterranean, China, and India, one can compare their social class systems, family structures, and religions. Interestingly, the Mediterranean societies were the only societies in which slaves were a major part of society. While slavery may have been present in China, a bottom class “mean” people performed labor. In India, the caste system made actual slavery impossible, though the class of “untouchables” performed degrading class, very much like a slave. Another difference is in religion, with the Mediterranean societies producing a polytheistic religion. However, this religion was not similar to any of the Chinese belief systems, and it is described as “unlike the Indians, however, the Greeks and Romans became interested in their gods in terms of what they could do for and reveal about mankind on this earth the principles that could elevate people toward higher planes of spirituality”(79). In spite of all these differences, all three societies had a similar family structure. In all three societies, the wives and children obeyed the father/husband, as he was the head of the family. All in all, though there were many differences, the three civilizations did have certain elements of society in common. In which society, India, China, or the Mediterranean, would you have wanted to be a merchant in the classical period? Explain your choice. Given the choice of being a merchant in China, India, or the Mediterranean, being a merchant in China would be the best choice. Merchants in the Mediterranean, specifically Rome, enjoyed a high

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    China’s main religions were Confucianism, Taoism, and Legalism. Whilst India's main religions were Buddhism and Hinduism. Ancient India was ruled by rajas while China was ruled by dynasties. Emperors were not of the same bloodline whilst dynasties were different families. In ancient India, same as China, there were social classes.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Han China vs. Mauryan/Gupta India Governance Classical Han China (202 BCE-220 CE) and Mauryan/Gupta India (324 BCE-184 BCE) have an abundance amount of similar/different techniques of imperial administration and governance. One similarity would be that both empires used taxation at some point as form of control over it’s people. As for a difference, one governed with harsh punishments and the other did not. Like Han China, the Indian empires began to decline due to military expenses and not enough taxes to pay for defense.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When Aryans came and conquered India, they brought a structure that had 4 different groups. This structure is called the caste system. The first class called Brahmins consisted of scholars, saints and teachers, and was the highest class in society. Brahmins lead a very strict life and avoid violence and greed. The King even was supposed to respect them and to kill a Brahmin was considered as a crime.…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Ancient China power and social rank correlated with land ownership. The lowest classes of people owned little or no land and share cropped on the land of more powerful people. This is also why Chinese societies did not like merchants, because of their lack of land. In China the Confucian ideal of filial piety and the five relationships influenced the social classes, with the five relationships involving a higher power member of society and a subordinate member of society. While in the Islamic caliphates did not have distinct social classes as under Islam all Muslims are equal in the Umma and those that were not Islamic were also treated well.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles of women within the two places were similar in the sense that women’s rights were limited and the emphasis on the power of the husbands and men was strong but different because women in Han China were allowed to make more contributions to society than women in India. Han China and Gupta India’s political institutions had more differences than similarities to each other. Overall, Han China structured a more centralized government than Gupta India. Han rulers retained the centralized administration and replicated a centralized government of the previous Qin dynasty that helped the dynasty to last its 400 year period of ruling. Bureaucracy, the system of government where most of the important decisions would be made by state officials (bureaucrats) instead of elected representatives, was greatly stressed by its expanding in Han China.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Han China and Gupta India were politically stable, Han China’s developing bureaucracy was centralized, while Gupta India was much more regionalized. Han China and Gupta India both featured extensive internal trade; however Gupta India was more involved with trade. Both empires had many intellectual achievements but Han China had much more innovative achievements, as in improving things, while Gupta India was much more dynamic, meaning the Indians worked on theories and then proved them. Something the Gupta Empire and the Han Empire had in common was that the emperors of these empires both believed they were chosen from the gods to rule.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Han China abandonment and infanticide were accepted because of economical problems. This lead to the conclusion that even under stable political and economic conditions an infants life was not preserved. “A starving woman beside the road hugs her child, then lays it in the weeds, looks back at the sound of its wailing, wipes her tear and goes on alone” (Doc. O). Since at this time in China many people were in the lower classes one can assume that it was normal that woman had left her child to die because she would not have been able to raise it and keep it living for long. Similarly in Classical Athens the father could decide if his baby would be exposed in the public to die.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Greece and Rome had centered around politics and government ideas, classical China focuses on family and leadership from the gods. Folk beliefs, Confucianism, and Taoism led to classical Chinese characteristics. In early times, Chinese performed rituals to soothe the nature Gods. Ancestors were worshipped for the communication with the Gods. These beliefs strengthened the family core.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing and Contrasting River Valley Civilizations Four of the major river valley civilizations are Sumer, Egypt, the Indus Valley, and China. All of these civilizations have revolutionary discoveries and inventions. They each have invented something or come up with a custom we still use today.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title Have you ever been told that you can’t do something because you’re a girl, or heard someone say to stay away from black people, or even been told that you aren’t right for something just because of how much money you have? All of these things would be social inequality. A social inequality is is the existence of unequal opportunities and rewards for different social positions or statuses within a group or society. Social inequalities can be based off of anything you classify yourself with.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republic was a model for our government system (USHistory, 2017). A system of elected officials in executive, legislative, and judicial branches that were responsible to the voters that elected them. The Roman Republic was comprised of Consuls, the Senate, and the Assemblies (Osborne, 2015). There were two consuls that were voted on annually, but their power was limited since they could veto each other. The Republic, naturally, was more corrupt because the consuls in power were voted by the patricians (USHistory, 2017).…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both civilizations valued religious knowledge but had different ways for people to obtain that knowledge. The Han had tests and Universities open to anyone who could afford it. These tests determined if you could work for the government or not. Meanwhile Mauryans had Caste, to obtain the knowledge needed to work for the government you must have been born into a certain Caste. To summarize China let people’s knowledge define their place in society, while India let family determined people 's place.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Ancient India a person was born into their social class and that never changed. They also were not permitted to mix with anyone of a different class form the cast system. They must only socialize with, work with and marry someone of their same social label. In Ancient China the social classes were not as divided and closed off from one another. The Chinese were born into their classes just the Indians…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although Ancient China and Ancient Egypt had no communication with each other, they still shared mant simalarites and differences. Their most important similarity was the way they ran their governments. Both had just one ruler, Egypt was ruled by a pharaoh, he was believed to be a messenger between men and gods however eventually the pharaoh became ruler himself and Under him served priests. In china there was a king and under him was Qin Shi who advised him on important matters and kept records. Religion was practiced by both Egypt and China.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    China-Indi Differences

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    China and India are two countries that appear to be similar, but in reality have differences in their economies, cultural environments, and governments. Worldwide, everyone lives under a government that they obey. There are various forms of government such as democracies, parliamentary, communist, and unions. India and China are governed way different from each other.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays