College Education Argumentative Essay

Federally FUNDED COLLEGE EDUCATIOn The United States is known for its generosity for providing federal funds towards educational institutions, this is especially true for colleges. And although this may prove beneficial to most polities, conflict theorists will disagree. For you see, conflict theorist would agree to the supposition that federally funded college education leads to inequality within polities, rather than equality; they would assert that because these funds are often taken directly from local property taxes, college institutions that belong within impoverished localities, and the poor persons that belong to them, are at a relative disadvantage compared to college institutions that belong to wealthier localities, because they receive better educational instruction, and resources in the end. Unequally funded educational institutions affects an individuals future in the long run. College is already expensive enough, and often, those persons with better financial situations are able to attend them. Schools tend to attract college students from an advantaged historical past because of their high costs and stiff academic necessities for enrollment. …show more content…
Similarly, well off college students who are able to pay for college regularly do not have to pay, due to the advantages they obtained by attending better elementary, middle, and high school educational institutions, which translated into better standardized scores, that are appealing to universities when it comes to recruiting. Because of this, there's less investment to be had for college students who actually need it. This ends up reinforcing the existing perception that conflict theorists hold, that educational systems in general, preserves the status quo and further lowers the status of the