It is evident that an individual must have a mind free of bias in order to provide a concrete and unbiased judgment for others. The cognitive dissonance affects the individuals’ ability and proficiency to provide good judgments from a perceived and an observed situational occurrence. Dissonance can be eliminated by being conscious about what you believe in and avoiding conflicts between beliefs and behavior. Cognitive dissonance can be reduced by less paying importance on the beliefs that are subjective to conflicts. Individuals can also reduce cognitive dissonance by targeting the beliefs that are most supportive and challenge the importance of the beliefs and behaviors that are dissonant. Self-attribution can be seen in different parameters and angles. Individuals do not have the same intellectual capacity, the ways of perceiving and viewing things, weighing occurrences, making decisions and making attributions to others. Some individuals are well prepared for such tasks, but some are born with certain capacities that others have to gather through nature and nurture.
…show more content…
These two words are dichotomously justified as related to adaptations or linked to the environmental conditions where individuals live. Naturally, individuals view things and appreciate situations differently. This regards how certain individuals have lived their lives from past experience which shapes their fashions of making attributions. Self–attribution based on nature and nurture can be explained relating to life experience. From experience gained from certain environments such as academic, neighborhood, work station, family etc… an individual is capable to retrospect and make self-attribution for others. The problem is that if an individual has spent his life in an environment where he had harvested bad souvenir, suffering, deception, and other negative situations that affected his life, he can infer to his past life and make self-attributions to others based on self-experience. His cognitive development may not validate his position of making attributions that would fit his perceptions. Cognitive development can be affected by the environmental and socio–economic lifestyle of the individuals. They sometimes strongly contribute to how the person tolerates situations and how he perceives them and then make attributions. Some individuals have higher cognitive and intellectual level. Some individuals have developed their intellects through documentation, experience, initiation, or nature nurture; for some, these capacities are innate. From these capacities they are able to control cognitive dissonance, and make decisions on what they believe is conceivable when formulating attributions To Whom It May Concern. Urbanity should be considered as a factor that influences self-attribution. As suggested by Gouin, Flamant, Gascoin, Rouger, Florin, Guimard. Roze, and Hanf (2015) there is a significant association linking urbanity with cognitive neurodevelopment. It is natural that individuals acquire cognitive development following what they do best and what they encounter throughout real life situations. Therefore, they contribute to their cognitive …show more content…
The process of both is under motion through the neural system. The mind has consecutive approaches that justify how individuals regard others and make attributions for them. Cognitive dissonance is merely seen at a confusing level engaging an individual’s behavior conflicting with his beliefs. At certain points cognitive dissonance can be avoided; when an individual knows himself and depending on what situation he stands. There is a possibility that cognitive dissonance can be reduced at some points. This whole process is about learning one’s self. Individuals must have a vibe about their behaviors and be apt to realize their personality. It is evident that self-observation of individuals’ personal behavior facilitates individuals to learn about themselves (GCU,
These two words are dichotomously justified as related to adaptations or linked to the environmental conditions where individuals live. Naturally, individuals view things and appreciate situations differently. This regards how certain individuals have lived their lives from past experience which shapes their fashions of making attributions. Self–attribution based on nature and nurture can be explained relating to life experience. From experience gained from certain environments such as academic, neighborhood, work station, family etc… an individual is capable to retrospect and make self-attribution for others. The problem is that if an individual has spent his life in an environment where he had harvested bad souvenir, suffering, deception, and other negative situations that affected his life, he can infer to his past life and make self-attributions to others based on self-experience. His cognitive development may not validate his position of making attributions that would fit his perceptions. Cognitive development can be affected by the environmental and socio–economic lifestyle of the individuals. They sometimes strongly contribute to how the person tolerates situations and how he perceives them and then make attributions. Some individuals have higher cognitive and intellectual level. Some individuals have developed their intellects through documentation, experience, initiation, or nature nurture; for some, these capacities are innate. From these capacities they are able to control cognitive dissonance, and make decisions on what they believe is conceivable when formulating attributions To Whom It May Concern. Urbanity should be considered as a factor that influences self-attribution. As suggested by Gouin, Flamant, Gascoin, Rouger, Florin, Guimard. Roze, and Hanf (2015) there is a significant association linking urbanity with cognitive neurodevelopment. It is natural that individuals acquire cognitive development following what they do best and what they encounter throughout real life situations. Therefore, they contribute to their cognitive …show more content…
The process of both is under motion through the neural system. The mind has consecutive approaches that justify how individuals regard others and make attributions for them. Cognitive dissonance is merely seen at a confusing level engaging an individual’s behavior conflicting with his beliefs. At certain points cognitive dissonance can be avoided; when an individual knows himself and depending on what situation he stands. There is a possibility that cognitive dissonance can be reduced at some points. This whole process is about learning one’s self. Individuals must have a vibe about their behaviors and be apt to realize their personality. It is evident that self-observation of individuals’ personal behavior facilitates individuals to learn about themselves (GCU,