This is important in that it provides the reader with ample historical and literary context that can deepen the understanding of the performance itself and of the place from which it emerged. Fusco’s articulation of the cage as a “blank screen onto which audiences projected their fantasies of who and what we are” (152) sets up the textual stage for the audience’s responses, which ultimately “indicate that colonialist roles have been internalized quite effectively” (153). In this way, the essay serves as the performers’ account on the performance—how it came to be, what was the logic behind it—but also as a way to return to those initial motifs and questions, and formulating clear answers based on the responses to the performance, thus illuminating the “reverse ethnography” aspect of its
This is important in that it provides the reader with ample historical and literary context that can deepen the understanding of the performance itself and of the place from which it emerged. Fusco’s articulation of the cage as a “blank screen onto which audiences projected their fantasies of who and what we are” (152) sets up the textual stage for the audience’s responses, which ultimately “indicate that colonialist roles have been internalized quite effectively” (153). In this way, the essay serves as the performers’ account on the performance—how it came to be, what was the logic behind it—but also as a way to return to those initial motifs and questions, and formulating clear answers based on the responses to the performance, thus illuminating the “reverse ethnography” aspect of its