but on the other side of this line we have conscious on its own .and when we have the idea of easy problems it implies that we can understand all the phenomenal one the list above on what consider to be easy problems. But the truth is we still have unanswered questions about the ‘easy problems ‘so why is the line made at that particular spot in the first place. drawing that line based on the current ignorance is stupid because there is still research to be done in the futre so saying it dosnt go further then what you saying is like say that any research is impossible .but with science anything is possible .Chalmers makes an argument that even if we were able to answers the easy problems it wouldn’t inform us of the hard problems but what evidence would support the idea if we did understand the easy question’s we still wouldn’t understand the hard ones .so the hard problem is the ignorant part of this premise that Chalmers made .if the method to understand a problem hasn’t been made then we can’t just dismiss it right away as being unsolvable . Chalmers proper, poses the danger of inventing an exploratory chasm where there really
but on the other side of this line we have conscious on its own .and when we have the idea of easy problems it implies that we can understand all the phenomenal one the list above on what consider to be easy problems. But the truth is we still have unanswered questions about the ‘easy problems ‘so why is the line made at that particular spot in the first place. drawing that line based on the current ignorance is stupid because there is still research to be done in the futre so saying it dosnt go further then what you saying is like say that any research is impossible .but with science anything is possible .Chalmers makes an argument that even if we were able to answers the easy problems it wouldn’t inform us of the hard problems but what evidence would support the idea if we did understand the easy question’s we still wouldn’t understand the hard ones .so the hard problem is the ignorant part of this premise that Chalmers made .if the method to understand a problem hasn’t been made then we can’t just dismiss it right away as being unsolvable . Chalmers proper, poses the danger of inventing an exploratory chasm where there really