Confidentiality Case Study

Great Essays
Confidentiality is of most importance with respect to a healthy patient-healthcare provider (HCP) relationship. According to Fisher (2013), confidentiality is defined as “the obligation of HCPs to maintain the privacy of their patients by keeping the information patients disclose to them confidential…not absolute, may be breached in order to keep the individual from harming herself or others” (2013). The possibility of a healthcare provider breaching the confidential right of a patient is a concern of many, as they may feel their personal medical information could be used against themselves. The case study “Breaching Privacy to Save Lives: HCP Knowledge of Possible Risk to Non-Patient Family Members” found in Fisher (2013) showcases Peter, a 36-year-old man who has suffered blackouts and recently been diagnosed with Long QT Syndrome. This mutation is found in his LQT2 gene and may be the reasoning behind his father’s unexpected death at 40 years of age. Peter’s three siblings have a 50 per cent chance of having the same condition, as well as nine nieces and nephews. A life-threatening feature of the condition is sudden cardiac death and may be prevented by cardiac defibrillators, drugs, or a pairing of these methods. However, Peter says he will only tell his relatives of their risks if they experience blackouts. Otherwise, he does not want them to worry, as they are dealing with their own financial issues, such as inadequate healthcare insurance. Healthcare providers wonder if they are justified to tell Peter’s family members of their possible risk. In a situation such as this, confidentiality may be breached as the patient’s decision may cause harm to others involved. It is important for these providers to understand their liability, while using ethical theories, such as utilitarianism, to produce a valid decision. Utilitarianism is a foundational ethical theory whose main attitudes arise from an essential feature of utilitarianism: the principle of utility. According to Fisher (2013), this is the “belief that we ought to maximize benefit or good consequences and minimize harm or negative consequences…” It is important that an action or practice is right if it leads to the greatest possible balance for good consequences. As moral decision makers, HCP should consider the "standard of goodness” (Fisher, 2013), where the goodness or badness of the consequence is determined by moral values that do not change from one person to the next. This is a cost-benefit analysis, where it is desired for the greatest possible amount of value to be created over disvalue (Beauchamp et al., 2007). If the HCPs do not warn Peter’s family, they may all be harmed by the genetic disease with possible death, as the risk is high at 50 per cent. This means a maximization of harm and negative consequence, which does not follow utilitarian methods. In turn, if the HCPs breach Peter’s wishes and alert his relatives, they could be saved from experiencing blackouts and other symptoms of the illness; maximizing benefits and positive consequences. However, this does not mean that all negative consequences will arise if they are unwarned. The judging HCP who is considering their decision must take account for what can be expected, while providing the best utilitarian outcome of positive consequences (Beauchamp et al., 2007). Good consequences arise when all involved in the ethical decision are treated equally. Another important aspect of utilitarianism is impartiality. The utilitarian approach involves impartial consideration for everyone affected by the decision (Beauchamp et al., 2007). This is a form of universalism where everyone is treated equally, with an impartial moral judgment that is formed without personal preferences, advantages or disadvantages based on oneself. The judgement is through an open-minded assessment without regard to race, sex, nationality, economic circumstances, etc. (Beauchamp et al., 2007). Peter is unwilling to tell relatives of their possible health risks due to their lack of symptoms and stressful financial issues. This …show more content…
In T. Beauchamp, L. Walters et al (Eds.) Contemporary Issues in Bioethics. (7th ed.) Belmont, Ca: Wadsworth, pp. 140-144.
Beauchamp, T. & Walters, L. (2007) “Types of Ethical Theory.” In T. Beauchamp and L. Walters (Eds.) Contemporary Issues in Bioethics. (7th ed.) Belmont, Ca: Wadsworth, pp. 12-22.
Fisher, J (2013) Biomedical Ethics: A Canadian Focus. Toronto: Oxford University Press
Beauchamp, T. & Walters, L. (2007). “Ethical Principles.” In T. Beauchamp, L. Walters, J. P. Kahn and A. C. Mastroianni (Eds.) Contemporary Issues in Bioethics. (7thed.) Belmont, Ca: Wadsworth, pp.

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    While we had been discussing and reading about the ethical, legal, and social implications of various different cases throughout the semester, reading The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks allowed me to see it from a whole new perspective. While I have learned quite a bit from all the discussion, the many assigned readings, and the overabundance of bioethics reference readings, this book truly carried my attention from cover to cover, pulling me into Henrietta’s family while sneakily telling me about Johns Hopkins research discovery of immortal cells. It showed me that ethics and legality aren’t t always be considered together (but they should), and how while ethical concerns should be permanently intertwined with social concerns, they are often…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Likewise, the primary justification doctors in The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks have for not asking for consent is that it the contributions of human test subjects and sample donors contribute to the greater good of science. However, the irony of this view is that the prices of health care prevent many patients from taking advantage of drugs and cures resulting from patient testing. If patients are unable to access the many medicinal advancements the medical community has at its…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A similarity between both the articles is that their cases share the concept of arguing to keep a patient informed. The Henrietta Lacks case presented in Callaway’s article shows the effect of Henrietta Lacks not receiving an informed consent when the Lacks family has their mother/grandmothers cells taken without any permission from her or her family (132). In a similar fashion, the John Moore case in Skloot’s article shows the lack of information Moore received as his doctor used his cells for monetary value. Both the Lack’s and Moore’s case have the negative outcome where cell researchers have caused both groups to suffer losses in finances and information gathering. However, unlike Callaway, Skloot also uses Ted Slavin’s case to show that when a patient receives an informed consent they are able to make money for themselves and also voluntarily help researchers gain cell resources for study (Skloot…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conceptual Claim: ¶ 1 – “President Clinton’s National Bioethics…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main ethical dilemma in the Case of Henrietta Lacks and Debate over Ethics and Bio-Medical Research and Informed Consent is that researchers took and profited off of the cells of Henrietta Lacks without her consent and without compensating her or her family. There are certain facts that are important to understand in this case. The person who began this ethical issue was George Otto Gey when he used the cells made available to him that had been of Henrietta Lacks, creating the He-La cell line (Skloot, 2010). Sadly, at the time, informed consent did not yet exist and did not become doctrine in practice until the late 1970s which was long past Lacks’ time (Skloot, 2010). Even though informed consent was not traditionally practiced in public…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tuskegee Response

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These principles are “respect for persons, beneficence, and justice” (Reverby, 2009). Overall, the Tuskegee Study allowed the public to apply ethics to health policy, and to ensure that human rights were not omitted while research was being conducted. Moreover, the institution of the National Research Act, the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavior Research, and the Belmont Report made the unconsented experiment of humans unethical and…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We’re taught to believe what is morally wrong and right to lead our lives. And in doing so, it should allow us to live life based on our morals free from the constrictions of ethical laws brutally enforced upon us. Although James Dillard, a medical resident, acted selflessly to save a drunk man’s life, looking back on it, he regrets risking his future as a doctor to save the man, a selfish act. Dillard’s moral standards as an almost qualified doctor to save the drunk man’s life were morally right.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Walter Glannon explores several moral problems with genetic enhancement in his article “Genetic Enhancement,” published in Glannon’s book, From Genes and Future people: Philosophical Issues in Human Genetics (and later in Bioethics Principles, Issues, and Cases.) Glannon believes that “gene therapy is permissible if it is intended to ensure or restore normal functions, but it is morally illegitimate if it is aimed at enhancing functions beyond normal.” (577) Glannon, a professor of bioethics and philosophy at the University of Calgary, holds the Canada Research Chair in Biomedical Ethics and Ethical Theory at the University of Calgary in Alberta. He is well known for publishing 4 books and over 27 articles related to bioethics and philosophy.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Task Template 2 - Argumentation What role should ethics play in genetic testing and bio-engineering? After reading informational texts addressing a selected topic write an editorial that addresses the question and support your position with evidence from the text(s). DL2 Be sure to acknowledge competing views.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics is the formal process of intentionally and critically analyzing with clarity and consistency, the basic of one’s moral judgment (Harman & Cornelis, 2017). According to the AHIMA Code of Ethics, HIM are responsible for the safeguarding of privacy and security of health information, disclosure of health information, development, use, and maintenance of health information systems and health information, and ensuring the accessibility and integrity of health information (AHIMA House of Delegates, 2011). HIM professionals face many ethical problems, sometimes they cannot wait for the law, policies and procedures and other guidelines because decisions must be made prior to the ability of these system to offer guidelines and in these case a code of ethics can guide someone on how to tackle those problems (Flite & Harman, 2013). The ethical values identified by…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even if they are unable to get their patient to agree to the disclosure, they have lived up to the obligations of their profession. Kipnis (2006/2008) concludes his argument by stating that “confidentiality… is effective at getting more patients into therapeutic alliances more quickly, it is more effective in bringing about better outcomes for more of them and—counterintuitively—it is most likely to prevent serious harm to the largest number of at-risk third parties” (p. 56). He is adamant that confidentiality and trustworthiness are the professional, moral requirements of doctors, and they are not to be broken even if legal precedent requires…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Additionally, Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt (2015) lists the Fifteen Ethical Principles of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights for clinical research (as cited in United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2008) to include the following: 1. Human dignity and human rights 2. Benefit and harm 3. Autonomy and individual responsibility 4.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What are the confidentiality rules? The Health and Social Care Information has set five basic rules for confidentiality, they are; 1. The patients and the service users confidential information should he handled carefully and with confidentiality. This can be done by giving importance to maintain trust and respect between the patient and healthcare provider followed with the confidentiality obligations.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Assisted Suicide Ethical? Physician-assisted suicide, also known as euthanasia or mercy killing is the act intentionally inducing a painless and quick death to patients who suffer from serious forms of diseases or patients in a permanent coma (Sjöstrand). Normally, it is carried out by a doctor or a nurse. Euthanasia has raised a lot of controversies all over the world and the main argument is based on whether causing a painless death is ethical. The advocates of euthanasia claim that it is ethical to perform euthanasia on terminally ill patients since it is a solution to patients who are hopeless and in great pain.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Informed consent means the knowing consent of an individual without inducement or any element of force, fraud, or any other form of constraint. Sufficient information must be presented so that the potential subject can make an informed judgment about participation. It can be provided to the potential participant as a document, which may or may not require a signature. Research involving human subjects can pose complex ethical issues that require careful thought and consideration on the part of both researchers and the research participants. Prospective participants should always be given adequate information on both the possible risks and the potential benefits of their involvement to allow them to make informed decisions about whether or not…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays