Brain In A Vat Argument Analysis

Superior Essays
The problem of scepticism comes to the conclusion that we do not know of our creation or existence, nor can we know. This assignment will dispute against scepticism in reference to the “Brain in a Vat” argument. This proposes that we are brains in vats which are connected up to an exceptionally sophisticated life force, in this case a computer, that somehow has the ability to counterfeit our experiences of the external world, deceiving us of what we thought to be reality. This argument of course, is highly plausible as we can never know confidently that what we understand to be reality isn’t a simulation. However this essay seeks to reveal flaws in this proposition, and understand why this possibility has proven to be unsolvable …show more content…
Until they are faced to really live with the trust that existence is an illusion. For instance, ask someone who believes they are a brain in a vat to jump from the top of a 15 story building, or even a 150 story building? Do you think they would? The chances of him or her jumping from the building is highly unlikely. And so it should be. To you or me, it is a completely irrational action. This is a sure-fire way to die. But of course, for the sceptic, they should have no fear, they won’t really be in any danger. Any pain felt is simply a signal that was sent to your brain via computer. This will show that even if you were to believe in this theory, you still would not live with the notion that anything you are experiencing does not actually exist. Therefore, what is the disastrous consequence in believing or not believing that you are a brain in a vat? You will still live with the fear of death, joy of love and pain of loss. Be these feelings and emotions reality or imitations. They are what we know and shouldn’t need to be justified of their authenticity if it makes no effect on how we are to continue …show more content…
. . is so obviously useful and so strongly confirmed by experience down through the ages that we can say without exaggerating that it is better confirmed than any other empirical hypothesis.” Hopefully this argument against the sceptics has shown how a constant reliance on scepticism as the answer leads us nowhere. To resolve either one we must either overcome scepticism by authorizing assertive knowledge, or learn to accept that scepticism is essentially repetitive and cannot be defeated without proof.

To conclude on this argument, the points made were that there is no valid reason for us to be given enough knowledge for us to have figured out that our experiences are illusions, that the mind is far too intricate to be designed by technology that does not possess these properties itself, for us to live with the belief that we are brains in vats may lead us to become ambiguous with everything and lack assurance, that in order for us to create a meaning for something we had to have perceived it, that a sceptic would not trust in the idea if he or she was placed in a situation of danger, and finally, that how our world works is revolved around our participation and actions. Proving we have self-control, we can contemplate our decisions and we can choose our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Approaching the conflictions regarding the controversial skeptical argument of the Brain in A Vat there can be many flaws or holes seen within the argument itself, Moore’s Proof, the Anti-Skeptical argument, and Modus Ponens. Throughout all of these examples many flaws or counter examples arise that can either help or reject the argument by themselves, but when using all together you get a better stance on the argument. Upon closer examination of premise one, I know that I have hands only if I know I am not a brain in a vat, this statement could be false itself because what if even if I was in a “Vat” I wasn’t just a brain but an entire body, seen within the movie The Matrix. Either way I personally don’t believe there has been an evidence to either disbelieve or believe this theory.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are a plethora of reasons to trust, believe, and feel the arguments the author provides. First, the reasons to…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes “Evil Deceiver” argument he argues that an evil demon is the source of our deception rather than an omnipotent God. The strongest argument that Descartes presents is the idea that our senses cannot be trusted as the world around us and everything we experience is a constructed illusion. In this paper, I will argue that this argument can be seen as sound as our senses can not be trusted because they are unreliable. In “Meditation I: What Can be Called Into Doubt” Descartes explains to us that the information we are receiving through our senses isn’t inherently accurate.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Computers and Craniums: A Continuing Cycle of Connections The enigma of the human mind is a puzzle that has fascinated many great scientists. From the earliest musings of the ancient philosophers to the advanced neuroscience research going on today, many intelligent people have worked to understand what is going on in our own heads. In an interesting phenomenon, our understanding of the mind is intimately linked to the technology that is used to study it, and the new findings that arise feed directly back into the development of new tools. As scientific equipment has become capable of better observing the brain and human behavior, the mind has come to be understood more as an incredibly complex machine than as an incomprehensible mass residing…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A statement is certain or justified if it is proved, but proof is impossible because it is question-begging – any criterion for the validity of a proof requires a different proof, since self-justification is too easy and always possible. A justification procedure…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that the only aspect of life, a person, can know for sure is that they are a thinking being. Any other sense data can be argued as devised. This paper will defend Descartes views and show that almost anything can be questioned. In 1619, Descartes decided to throw out all the knowledge he perceived with his senses.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In their work, The Extended Mind, Andy Clark and David Chalmers present the extended mind hypothesis to argue against the idea of the mind consisting solely of inputs and outputs. The hypothesis argues that the mind is not simply an internal thing, but rather that it can exist externally and be part of an individual’s environment. Clark and Chalmers argue for this this by presenting the examples of Otto, a man whose memories and knowledge lie in a notebook, and Inga someone who stores all the information in her mental states. I will argue that the extended mind hypothesis is unsuccessful because there is no clear line of what is actually known and what is only thought to be known. The extended mind hypothesis is the argument that…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the paper, ‘The Extended Mind’, authors Andy Clark and David J. Chalmers put forth the notion of “extended cognition”, which is the idea that the process of acquiring knowledge can extend outside of one’s own physical body. At the center of Clark and Chalmers argument is an analogy between two different individuals, Inga and Otto. Inga’s cognitive process takes place inside of her brain. Otto’s cognitive process includes phenomena external to his physical body. Specifically, it includes a notebook.…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is relevant because allowing people to believe in such nonsense promotes faulty thinking. Although being a skeptic is important, you need to be able to analyze information in a reasonable…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke's Argument Against Innate Ideas

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    The first of these arguments was that there is no universal assent; the second argument was that if innate ideas are through reason, then they are deduced and lastly, the third argument was that if self-evidences is equal to innateness, the consequences of innate ideas end with something absurd. It touched on Locke’s general concept of experience and how we in fact experience things through reflection and sensation. Lastly, examples of supporting and opposing arguments and ideas on the subject matter were discussed as a way of comparing the ideas in all of…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Luberda PHIL 1100 04 December 12th Throughout the course of this paper, the topic of skepticism will be discussed in multiple ways. First skepticism will be introduced in John Pollock’s short article A Brain in a Vat. Then the difference between ordinary incredulity and general philosophical skepticism will be discussed. Finally, the various general philosophical skepticism will be analyzed and opinions of arguments will be discussed.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Matrix: Final There is an assurance that at one point in life, the end will come for each individual and everybody will perish at one point. For now, as humans and living things, we are all doing what we do best, exist. However, imagine if the life one believes to be a part of was not actual and in fact, it was all just a virtual concept in the mind. Having had watched the film, The Matrix, this paper analyzes comparisons between appearance and reality to the writings of Bertrand Russell’s, Problems of Philosophy. Thenceforward, René Descartes’, Meditations on First Philosophy are examined and the Method of Doubt is conveyed, carefully analyzing each of its stages.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Intellect:Mind over Matter, Mortimer Adler probes the relationship between the mind and the body. He describes the four main theories regarding this relationship and separates them into two categories: extreme and moderate. Among the four theories, Adler argues in favor of moderate immaterialism. His argument is easily the most convincing as it accounts for the essential difference between man and animal, our intellect, while acknowledging the congruity between the mind and body.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Parfit introduces his understanding of non-causal answers by first distinguishing between two questions. He asks readers to first contend why any sort of universe would come into existence and then to ponder why the created universe operates as it does. With respect to the creation of the universe, Parfit explains that reasons for the existence of any sort of universe are usually directed towards the existence of an omnipotent deity or the eternal existence of the universe.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes, especially in his First Meditation, condemns the ability of sensation to provide information about the natural world and humans’ surroundings. Although he believes that humans must trust their senses to understand the obvious, he believes that not all perceptions can be trusted as bodily senses can be deceptive to internal understanding. However, a problem arises: how can one contemplate everything that is perceived around them as false? Certainly, unknown truths must reside in experiences not yet encountered especially those that require interactions with distant places and unfamiliar ideas. Descartes argues that these unfamiliarities are produced by pure introspection, but it can be argued that communication with a superior being allows humans to fully understand their supposed innate ideas.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays