Atheistic Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
Show More
In this paper I will consider the atheistic point of view on the argument from evil, while addressing free will. This is one of the main arguments against the existence of an all-good and all-knowing God, which was discussed in class.
Atheistic Argument From Evil
If God exists, then He is omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly good.
If God were omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly good, then the world would not contain evil.
The world contains evil.
Therefore, God does not exist. Beginning with Premise one, it states that if God exists, then He is omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly good. This meaning that God knows everything, He is all-powerful, and great. I believe that premise one is true. God is great and perfectly good. However, Atheists disagree. They depend on evidence to question God’s existence. In saying this, atheists believe that evidence needs inductive and empirical reasoning, as well as logical and conceptual premises. A difference exists between theism and atheism in that atheists have not offered faith as a justification for non-belief. That being said, atheists have presented no-evidence defenses for believing that there is no God. Moving on to premise two, it says that if God were omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly good, then the world would not contain evil. Atheists believe that God has the power to eliminate all evil if he really is omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly good. Trying to answer that question may be similar to walking in shoes that are too big. We have no guarantee that God understands things as the way that society sees them. In reality, we are speaking of a God powerful enough to create the entire universe. Why would we expect his thoughts to be like ours? The Bible even says that God’s ways are not like ours. “‘For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,’ declares the Lord. ‘As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.” Of course an atheist would not believe this because it is not logically proven. Perhaps evil is a learning process that God is wanting the world to cope through. The Bible says God is “refining” and “shaping” his creation. Hard times often help people grow and mature. Evil strengthens society, making people humble, and showing perseverance. Tragedy can grow our faith that leads people to look beyond their narrow views to a more caring, universal …show more content…
A theodicy is an argument that attempts to make evil compatible with God. Conceivably the most famous theodicy is the free will defence. It argues that evil is the product of our free will. God gave us free will, something that is very beneficial. It is better to have a universe that is free, than without. However, being morally imperfect does not use free will for good, but sometimes brings about evil. Yet God cannot make people with free will act appropriately. Given how great free will is, it can bring about evil too. For example, a person is made good until they murder an innocent person. That is morally wrong and that person used their free will to inflict evil. We can object that the argument only deals with moral evil, evil that people bring about, through choice. It does not account for natural

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Theodicy Kenneth Surin Analysis
    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Theodicy Kenneth Surin Analysis

    In an attempt to understand many have concluded that if there is evil in the world then there must not be a God. While others cling to the idea that because of evil there is a better understanding of a higher being. Personally, I am more inclined to conclude the latter of the two idea. Although I wouldn’t consider myself to be a religious person I understand that there is a higher being to which many people look to in order to be fulfilled. Who or what that higher being may be is a topic for another paper but for the sake of this idea we will say this higher being is God.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Julian's Theory Of Evil
    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Julian's Theory Of Evil

    His omnipotence gives his the ability to create each of the infinite possible universes. Among those infinite possibilities, there would be another infinite number of universes without evil. If God is omniscient, he would fully know and fully understand…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Augustine And Evil
    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Augustine And Evil

    Epicurus was one of the first philosophers to consider the problem of evil and his question; “if He is both willing and able (to take away all evils), which alone is suitable to God, from what source then are evils? Or why does He not remove them?” , summarises concisely the issue which has been at the forefront of philosophical argument for thousands of years. To explore this question I will first consider what God is. In this essay I will refer to God in the orthodox monotheistic sense of the word as an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent being. Likewise, evil refers to all that is bad in the world.…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mackie Evil And Existence Summary
    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mackie Evil And Existence Summary

    He argues that these premises are inconsistent since all three of them cannot exist at the same time. The premise below states that the free choice of good or evil by men is dependent on God. And if men can choose good on some occasion, then men can choose good over evil on every occasion. But the existence of evil and men making bad choices a lot of the time questions the omnipotence and omnibenevolence of God. Following are the premises extracted from the argument:…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Swinburne's Theodicy: The Logical And Evidential Problem Of Evil
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Richard Swinburne's Theodicy: The Logical And Evidential Problem Of Evil

    The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of J. L. Mackie's Evil And Omnipotence
    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of J. L. Mackie's Evil And Omnipotence

    Evil and Omnipotence In Evil and Omnipotence, J.L. Mackie presents fallacious solutions that try solving the logical problem of evil. Fallacious solutions explicitly maintain all their propositions, but implicitly end up rejecting at least one of them. The fourth fallacious solution (S4), claims that moral evil is necessary in any world containing the overriding good of human freedom. In this paper, I will demonstrate: (I) S4; (II) Mackie’s objection of S4; (III) A primary benefit of Mackie’s argument; and (IV) Why Mackie’s criticism succeeds. (I) S4:…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Swinburne's Existence: The Logical Problem Of Evil
    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Swinburne's Existence: The Logical Problem Of Evil

    The reason why we give this up is because getting rid of God being omnibenevolent would diminish the idea of him existing. Not only that, you can’t get rid of evil because evil actually…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Elliot Sober Arguments From Evil
    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Elliot Sober Arguments From Evil

    Arguments From Evil: Elliot Sober I. Introduction The reality of evil existing in our world has been questioned throughout time based on the argument that an all powerful, all knowing, and all good (all-PKG) God cannot coexist with evil. The problem of evil only appears when there is a PKG God because if God is all powerful, all knowing, and all good then how could there still be evil. Therefore, if one of those properties we removed then there would no longer be a problem because then God couldn 't prevent evil from happening.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Evil And Omnipotence Analysis
    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Evil And Omnipotence Analysis

    In his third premise, Mackie asserts that God failed to go with “the obviously better possibility of making beings who would act freely but always go right” (p. 124). Because God either was not able to or simply chose not to creates beings who always choose to do the good thing while they act freely, Mackie concludes that God cannot be both omnipotent and omnibenevolent. Mackie’s argument is logically valid, but since I believe there to be several discrepancies with his logic and reasoning, I do not believe his conclusion to be sound. For example, people have varying definitions of what constitutes “good” and “evil” and people might be acting in a situation with the intention of doing the good thing, only to have that action result in evil.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Gottfried Wilhelm Von Leibniz's Theodicy
    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gottfried Wilhelm Von Leibniz's Theodicy

    My midterm paper will be covering the issues of Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz’s Theodicy and the problem of evil as well as the objections to his argument. In life, I favor optimism over cynicism, but sometimes it can be hard when there are so many horrible things that occur within our world. After reading Leibniz’s theory for the problem of evil and why it occurs, I was moved because he finally put in to words my everlasting faith for the reason God does the things that he does. Leibniz’s theodicy is based on the “best of all possible worlds” argument and his “metaphysical evil” argument. The first argument, which I’ll refer to as worlds, first establishes God’s existence and continues on listing the characteristics of Him.…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Sokolowszer's Argument For The Existence Of God?
    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sokolowszer's Argument For The Existence Of God?

    In this essay, using two theistic approaches of proof I will argue and discuss the arguments for the existence of God. In doing so I will use Sokolowski and Moser’s approaches while drawing upon other theologian scholars too. Views about theistic arguments are widely diverse, especially contemporary proponents. “Proofs” are merely those that provide arguments with premises that no reasonable person could deny. I will be focusing mainly on Rober Sokolowski book, The God of Faith and Reason, here he examines the existence of God through understanding God as a creator and looking at Christian perspective of this instead of directing faith and reason as major motives.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Cosmological Argument For God's Existence Of God
    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cosmological Argument For God's Existence Of God

    Introduction Science is based on the premise that everything originated from something and to believe that this universe occurred by random chance seems illogical. The perplexities and intricacies of nature postulates the idea, or lack thereof, of a higher power. The question of God’s existence is one that has intrigued humanity and countless of philosophers since the beginning of logical thinking. Many philosophers believe that God exists, while others argue and refute His existence. Did the universe really occur by random chance?…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of On Being An Atheist By J. Mccloskey
    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Analysis Of On Being An Atheist By J. Mccloskey

    Response Paper H. J. McCloskey is a proclaimed atheist, and in his article, “On being an Atheist” he explains his views in a unique way from the 1960’s while refuting various arguments and views held by theists. McCloskey brings up a whole pot of valid points in his arguments. However, Evans & Manis, the authors of Philosophy of Religion: Think About Faith and Holmes, the author of Ethics: Approaching Moral Decisions are able to counter and bring up many points and McCloskey’s points concerning the existence of God and the truth that the world was created by an intelligent designer. Mr. McCloskey pointed out in more than one occasion the existence of the universe is not enough to show that there is a God. I believe that there are multiple options for our world and the universe is the “handiwork of an omnipotent, all-perfect being” (McCloskey 1968).…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Solving The Problem Of Evil
    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Solving The Problem Of Evil

    Solving the problem of Evil God’s existence have been questioned multiple times throughout the history. Philosophers such as St. Thomas Aquinas and Paley proved the existence of God throughout the order and design of the universe. On the other hand, philosophers such as Hume in his philosophical paper “ The Problem of Evil” had pointed out the opposite. In what follow, I will discuss how the cosmological and teleological arguments solve the problem of evil and re affirm the existence of God. .…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Importance Of Procedural Knowledge
    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Importance Of Procedural Knowledge

    In deducing the mere logical possibility of a God, it is important that one first delves into exactly what characteristics this being is said to have; mainly what is it this being can and cannot do. Religions touting a singular entity, God, to be their creation of the world, hold several interesting beliefs with regard to the characteristics of such a being; God is Omnipotent, omniscient, and is morally perfect. Religions holding a singular God to be responsible for creation, have a similar belief, in that God, in his perfect goodness, used his powers of omnipotence, created a world, which he knows everything about, as he is also omniscient. Some of these characteristics have very clear consequences attached to them, leading to incoherence…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings