Many scientists shown over the years that we don’t need animals to be tested on. When did we disease as people that we should find a cure for a human disease and test it on an animal then see if it works. Exactly it doesn’t make sense if you had to chose between a human and a mouse who would you pick. In that case, to put it your saying that you are letting a mouse suffer and the other way around no matter what something or someone will suffer at the end. Only nine percent of products used on animals are on market One alternative is if we didn’t have animal testing, then how will know the affects without testing it. Since the beginning of time human always were dominate over the animal. Testing animals, scientists are more efficient they do those things to protect humans. Untested products could hurt human and testing on animal is the only way make sure people don’t get hurt. To look at it in another way the world is better if we had animals to test on rather than human being
Many scientists shown over the years that we don’t need animals to be tested on. When did we disease as people that we should find a cure for a human disease and test it on an animal then see if it works. Exactly it doesn’t make sense if you had to chose between a human and a mouse who would you pick. In that case, to put it your saying that you are letting a mouse suffer and the other way around no matter what something or someone will suffer at the end. Only nine percent of products used on animals are on market One alternative is if we didn’t have animal testing, then how will know the affects without testing it. Since the beginning of time human always were dominate over the animal. Testing animals, scientists are more efficient they do those things to protect humans. Untested products could hurt human and testing on animal is the only way make sure people don’t get hurt. To look at it in another way the world is better if we had animals to test on rather than human being