Socrates Defense In Plato's Apology

Great Essays
Plato’s Apology tells the tale of Socrates’ defense, counterproposal, and death sentence in front of a jury of approximately 500 Athenian citizens. Plato’s Crito is named after a wealthy friend of Socrates who the philosopher invokes during his defense as an example of one of the men present in the jury who had enough exposure to his teachings, whether directly or through relatives, to have grounds to testify as a witness against Socrates if indeed his teachings were corrupting the young. An analysis of Socrates’ defense in Apology and the Laws’ defense (anthropomorphized by Socrates) in Crito suggests that Socrates is not opposed to the Laws themselves, but rather the misapplication of the Laws. Before exploring the relationship between …show more content…
With that in mind, it is clear that Socrates’ quarrel is not with the Laws, for then he would be quarreling with himself. Rather, Socrates uses this rhetorical device as a means to get Crito to understand why he is opposed to the idea of evading his death sentence. In the excerpt above in which the Laws warns Socrates of the consequences that await him if he breaks the covenant with the city by going into exile, it is clear that Socrates is not opposed to the Laws but rather to the human beings to whom he allegedly did injustice by and how they applied the Laws to sentence Socrates to death. Crito describes this misapplication of the Laws: “ . . . the way the lawsuit was introduced into the law court, even though it was possible for it not to be introduced; the way the judicial contest itself took place; and now this; the ridiculous conclusion of the affair.” Socrates’ dialogue with the Laws combined with his unrepentant defense followed by complete compliance with the sentence suggests that he has no intention in breaking his covenant with them as an Athenian citizen, but rather is fully invested in the Laws and instead opposed to the misapplication of the system by human beings such as Meletus, Anytus, and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Since the Laws exist as one element, to break one would be to break every one of them, and in doing as such, Socrates would bring about them incredible damage. The citizen is bound to the Laws like a child is bound to a guardian, thus to conflict with the Laws would resemble striking a guardian. As opposed to just infringing upon the Laws and departure, Socrates ought to attempt to induce the Laws to release him. These Laws introduce the national's obligation to them as a sort of social contract. By living in Athens, a resident is bound by supporting the Laws, and complying with them.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In both stories, *The Apology* and *Crito* deal with morals and ethics of if it is acceptable to disobey laws set in place by your government or by state. In *The Apology* Socrates is placed in court and charged with not following the gods that have been set in place by his government, and “corrupting” the Athenian youth. He boldly sticks to his opinion in a condescending way in which he antagonizes the jurors and gets sentenced to death. In this dialogue he is disregarding his government’s laws. He is proud to be put to death because he knows that it will do the jurymen more harm them good.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s The Apology, a trial is depicted to convict Socrates, a man who simply wanted to seek and define the truth, for corrupting the youth of Athens, and harming the relations among citizens by causing disrespect through his practice of philosophy. The trial seeks to uncover the truth of Socrates’ actions, or rather, if his actions were a harm to the society of Athens. In regards to the city, the prosecution had some strong arguments, and many weak ones that Socrates goes on to discredit time and time again. As for the defense, many accounts of strong and weak arguments existed, that were followed by no dispute by the prosecution. That being said, despite even their weakest argument, the defense put forth the best support for their case.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These series of questions culminate into Socrates’ conception of virtue leading him to reject Crito’s pleas for him to escapes because if he does he will be disobeying the laws of the state. By disobeying the law of the state he would be committing an injustice and doing what is wrong therefore harming his soul. If he harmed his soul, then he would not be living the virtuous or examined life which he states in the Apology “is not worth living”; so even if he disagrees with the state he must still obey its laws since that is, in his perception of virtue, just and right. This dialogue gives more understanding as to why Socrates questions the views and actions of others and gives practice to Plato’s teachings from Euthyphro and…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following essay will discuss Socrates reasons for refusing Crito’s offer of help in Crito, as well as whether or not these refusals are justified. We will discuss each of Socrates reasons for refusing in turn, criticising each as we move through the dialogue. Crito raises the problem of the extent to which a moral person is obligated to their City State (referred to as Athens and the State throughout), as well as the individual's dedication to the central principle of the dialogue; never doing any wrong. We will focus on the idea that by being wronged by the State, Socrates’ obligation is dissolved but his reasons remain justified due to his dedication to the avoidance of wrongdoing and Plato's need to have Socrates be a consistent character and this being the sole justification for his refusal. Socrates gives four reasons as to why he refuses Crito’s offer of escape.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We argued that that the imprisonment of an innocent man has already undermined the Laws of Athens and so his escape would be just, in reversing the damage to the state. However, Socrates believes that one should ever wrong someone else, and he believes that his escape would undermine the Laws of Athens, and so under this justification, Socrates is justified in not escaping. We considered the idea that perhaps for Socrates his not escaping is not about political obligation but is instead a matter of maintaining his character, and if this is his true justification then he is justified in his…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set during the socratic age of philosophy, The Apology by Plato chronicles the trial of Socrates on the charges of corruption of youth and not believing in the Gods. Plato, a young follower and apprentice of Socrates, documents the trial in its’ entirety from beginning to the unfortunate end in which Socrates is sentenced to death. The Apology is the trial of Socrates on a very basic and literal level but upon further inspection, one comes to realize that not only the philosopher is on trial but philosophy itself. Throughout the piece, Socrates attempts to convince the jury of philosophy’s worth and also criticize the condition of man. Furthermore, the recounting of the trial is also a protest of the hypocrisy within the Greek society that…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    (p. 20). This statement is a clue as to what Socrates personal beliefs are on acting just and with piety. With his words, he shows the court that although he does not agree with the charges, he will act as the law has been written for all of the citizens of Athens. He does not expect special treatment and his acceptance of his fate through “God wills” is that of a pious nature. The “God wills” line is sort of a slap in the face to those accusing him because, for Socrates to put his fate in Gods’ hands, it goes against the very nature of the accusations of his atheist behavior.…

    • 2276 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With his reasoning and arguments, Socrates decides to not obey the Laws of the state and proceeds with his verdict. Socrates knows that he did not truly commit a crime or disobey with the laws, but he did not want to commit an unjust action as well. Although one may not agree with the ideas and beliefs of a state, that…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are the charges against Socrates as recorded in the Apology. Is he guilty of them? why or why not? In Plato’s Apology, there were several charges against Socrates during his trial.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Every human being has the ability to decide what they believe and what they do not. At a very early age, we develop judgement that allows us to choose whether or not to accept certain claims. These assertions may be tempting, but our reasoning allows us to critically analyze the information with respect to all of our previous knowledge. These claims may be faith based, fact-based, or opinion. Without recognizing it, we take every bit of information we gather, analyze it, and decide whether we accept its validity.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antigone Vs Law Analysis

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This argument is true, as Socrates intends to go against the state laws, yet discloses his respect for the Athenian government. When the death sentence was announced, Socrates did not try to further make amends with the officials and therefore accepted his fate. Both Socrates and Antigone are willing to be put to death for their beliefs, but for different reasons. Socrates and Antigone would disagree with each other’s opinions on obeying the law, as they appear to be on opposite sides of the same spectrum.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wentz, “ In the Apology Socrates is represented as condoning disobedience. First (29d) he states that he would “never stop practicing philosophy” even if so ordered by the jury at his trail. Second (32 c-d) Socrates proudly tells of his disobedience to the Thirty Commissioners when they ordered him to go to Salamis to get Leon. Thus, there is at least apparent inconsistency between the Apology and the Crito on the question of disobeying the law. ”(Wentz).…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s dialogue Apology, Socrates stands trail to defend himself from the accusations of “corrupting the youth” and disregarding the Gods of the state. In his speech he tells the jury that an oracle at Delphi told Chaerephon a friend of Socrates that Socrates is a man of wisdom and no man is wiser than he is. To prove this cannot be true Socrates conducts cross examinations to find someone who is wiser than he is. Through these examinations Socrates mission and main points are to help people by exposing their ignorance to find wisdom, to find virtue, to find truth and to improve the soul.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘The Apology’ written by Socrates most famous student Plato, is a Socrates dialogue where he is defending himself from the accusations of corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods of Athens. He tells the court that these accusations are false and he does believe in the gods of Athens. He also tells them that he did not corrupt the youth, in fact the youth followed him on their own free will. According to Socrates the problem was that people who called themselves wise were not actually very wise, their knowledge was based on ignorance thinking that they were wise and he wanted to help them see that true knowledge was knowing nothing rather than believing that they know everything. As philosophy is based on questioning everything,…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays