For instance, teenagers going through many different emotional and cultural changes have a variety of perspectives on how to control their anger. Teenagers act on their spontaneous hormones and usually believe responding vengefully is the most justful choice. Most teenagers think revenge is the answer to their problems; such as, fighting back, or gossiping. Yet, that isn’t the most effective way. Having what’s done to you, and doing it back doesn’t help in many conflicts. In fact, it would only make the situation worse and …show more content…
They clarify why they did such an action and the jury concludes if they are guilty. Even in life, giving the same punishment that they’ve done isn’t the first choice. So why make that decision in your life? Also, if someone commits a crime, doing the same back to them, is technically a crime. If you act accordingly to what has been done, most likely, the person will learn a valuable lesson, without retaliation necessary.
Lastly, if someone robbed you, why do the same towards them? Yes, they shouldn’t be trusted again, but if an individual does the same oneself shouldn’t either. It dosen’t show anything to him except to do it again. So, it happens repeatedly and the next victim could use that same method. Which would only make everyone rob each other. Clearly, that makes no sense, it would only blow up the situation. On that note, I once read in a book that “an eye for an eye, will turn the whole world blind” That is true, it teaches people to do the harm that has been done to