“I have seen probably all of the pictures which are suppose to depict Indian life, and not one of them is correctly made… I have gone personally to directors and stage managers and playwrights and explained this to them, telling them that their actions do not play the part as it should be played… but the answer is always the same, ‘The public doesn’t know the difference.’ ” (Bear 285). In other words, in this section the author states that the interpretation of Native Americans created by the American movie industry rejected the factual interpretations of Indian life and helped implement the stereotypical Indian images used in the western media. Hollywood also presented formidable problems and challenges for Native Americans because studio practices were particularly hard on Indian actors; they obtained small roles and played extras. Starring roles were obtained by non-Indians, even when the script called for Indian characters” (Rosenthal 338-340). By acknowledging that the Hollywood industry utilized non-Indians for Indian roles, it is reemphasized by the two authors that the American culture, that was not previously acknowledged by Hollywood, accepted the stereotypical compositions of the noble warrior Indian that wore headdresses and was in touch with nature and spiritual ancestry. Given that the American Indian generation sought to escape the economic struggles of the reservation life, the acceptance of the roles which epitomized the Native American stereotypes increased the generalizations accepted by the general population. In other words, some products of the stereotypical Native American person introduced to the general American population were consisted with the young
“I have seen probably all of the pictures which are suppose to depict Indian life, and not one of them is correctly made… I have gone personally to directors and stage managers and playwrights and explained this to them, telling them that their actions do not play the part as it should be played… but the answer is always the same, ‘The public doesn’t know the difference.’ ” (Bear 285). In other words, in this section the author states that the interpretation of Native Americans created by the American movie industry rejected the factual interpretations of Indian life and helped implement the stereotypical Indian images used in the western media. Hollywood also presented formidable problems and challenges for Native Americans because studio practices were particularly hard on Indian actors; they obtained small roles and played extras. Starring roles were obtained by non-Indians, even when the script called for Indian characters” (Rosenthal 338-340). By acknowledging that the Hollywood industry utilized non-Indians for Indian roles, it is reemphasized by the two authors that the American culture, that was not previously acknowledged by Hollywood, accepted the stereotypical compositions of the noble warrior Indian that wore headdresses and was in touch with nature and spiritual ancestry. Given that the American Indian generation sought to escape the economic struggles of the reservation life, the acceptance of the roles which epitomized the Native American stereotypes increased the generalizations accepted by the general population. In other words, some products of the stereotypical Native American person introduced to the general American population were consisted with the young