Active Euthanasia In The United States

Improved Essays
Depending on the situations, voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia can be looked upon as voluntary manslaughter (someone kills another person, but situation can somewhat justify their actions) or murder. Euthanasia is divided into two different categories, passive euthanasia and active euthanasia. This paper is to briefly explore euthanasia and the different definitions, and to explore whether active euthanasia should be practiced in the United States or abroad.

CRITICAL ISSUES

The concern of human life and pleasure, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government.” (Thomas Jefferson.) Advancement in current medical technologies have served to disagree with individual’s choice to end their life.
…show more content…
“Passive euthanasia includes omitting to provide (withholding or withdrawing) life-prolonging treatment” (MY BooK). Included methods of death would include removing life support, the stopping any medical procedures, elimination of food and water, and abstaining from use of CPR (Cardiopulmonary resuscitation). Legal issues hardly arise from passive euthanasia. Physicians have the right to withhold the patient’s food and water if the patient is comatose which means that swallowing is very dangerous. Overseers’, guardians and powers of attorney’s regularly sign DNR (Do not resuscitate) requests that give medical officials the right to refrain from resuscitating a patient. “There are obvious uncertainties in both active and passive euthanasia. Doctors should try to save lives and not to terminate their patient life. Even when their patient seems to be hard to cure, they still should try not to make euthanasia a choice. Doctors do not have the right to decide whether their patient should live or die. Problems arise when doctors disagree over a medical prognosis. For example, a patient might be so depressed by serve pain that one day that individual may want to terminate their life while the next day that induvial has the strength to live. I believe that as long as the patient is alive, there is a chance that he or she will be cured and that they will live. There are a lot of medical

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Most often only the patient is discussed in the evaluation of the case for euthanasia. The physician also has rights as to perform the act they are being asked to perform. Physicians have a right to make the decision to agree with euthanasia or not. The physician has great moral and ethical decisions that need to be weighed. The physicians role as healer would ultimately be questioned.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many wonder if euthanasia is right and moral and if it is not what should be done when being faced with this situation. I think the best way to look at physician-assisted euthanasia is through consequentialism and deontology. It’s important we look at the consequences of physician-assisted suicide because they are literally the difference between life and death. A patient that is gravely ill or in a coma may be diagnosed and given a time limit until death, however, some patients have surprised their doctors.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a patient has the right to choose how they live their life then the patient has the right to choose how they will die. In the article “Governor Signs End-of-Life Act” governor Jerry Brown states that if he were to be dying of a prolonged and excruciating pain he would feel more comfortable having the option of being prescribed a lethal drug because he will have a choice how he die. Furthermore in the article “Physician-Assisted Suicide Debate: Are We Using the Right Language” doctors argued that the patient has a right to choose early death because in some cases the patient can be suffering. For example Brittany Maynard, who has a terminal illness was passionate to choose when she died. Opponents argue that having assisted suicide takes away from the doctors duties as a healer.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay, “ Active and Passive Euthanasia,” by James Rachel he makes the argument that there is nothing morally wrong with Passive Euthanasia that’s given to be acceptable. Passive Euthanasia letting someone die becoming permissible is an acceptance Rachel proves from the behalf standards of medical reasons. Medical reasons doctors can take out tubes, respirator, etc.. “Letting go” is a decision making doctors do for the patient to die having no pain of suffrage anymore. It’s not a consequence for causing a death on purpose, “ the matter of life and death is being decided on irrelevant grounds.” (Rachel, p.290).…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should euthanasia be legal in the United States? Originating from the Greek terms "eu" (happy or good) and "thantos" (death), euthanasia literally means "happy death" or "good death". It is commonly defined as, “the act of bringing about the death of a hopelessly ill and suffering person in a relatively quick and painless way for reasons of mercy” (LeBaron 1). Assisted suicide is a form of euthanasia, when a person helps commit suicide or provides information of how to do so to another person. A person taking another person 's life without his or her request in order for that person not to have ample suffering is a mercy killing.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Opponents say that difficult decisions are supposed to be made, by one’s self, family, and a physician, about a life that is at an end and should be allowed to be let go. It is not for the government to decide when the plug should be pulled or for a death pill to be administered. While opponents argue medically assisted suicide is unethical and will lead society down a slippery slope, proponents argue that it is ethically permissible, and is “the ultimate civil right” and not to let mentally competent, terminally ill patients who want to end their pain and suffering in a peaceful manner, is disrespectful to their right to personal autonomy. But the more modern day medicine and technology continue to pull people from the brink of death, more and more people will be asking for the right to end their lives, because extending the length of life, allows time for more people to become terminally ill and be in pain. Virtually all people want their loved ones to remember them as they once were, not what they could become in the years following the diagnosis of a terminally illness.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Active euthanasia is when direct action is taken, ending the life of the patient. I chose to focus my paper on the article entitled “Voluntary Active Euthanasia” written by Dan W. Brock. In "Voluntary Active Euthanasia", Brock analyzes the arguments for and against the legalization of active euthanasia. From his perspective, an individual’s well-being and control over…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Controversies have been revolving around the reckless outcomes in the legality of euthanasia. Also known as mercy killing, euthanasia is the implementation of dismissing a life with a terminal illness or intolerable suffering. In the levels of morality and professionalism, it is ludicrous to assist termination of one’s life, especially in a passive or involuntary way. Legalization of euthanasia has proven higher levels of convictions in non-voluntary euthanasia. Thus, the United States as well as many other countries around the world, have developed a negative reputation from controversial cases surrounding assisted suicides.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I am going to talk about the topic of euthanasia. I will argue that active euthanasia is morally permissible in the case of a terminally ill patient who is going through unbearable amounts of pain. Furthermore, the focus of this paper will only be on this type of euthanasia; active euthanasia. However, in the first part of my essay I will not only define what active euthanasia is but I will explain how it differs from other types of euthanasia such as physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    After examining all the relevant argument surrounding this topic, it was easy to formulate an opinion supporting voluntary euthanasia in limited circumstances. The contemporary thinker, Peter Singer provides a sound argument that outlines how voluntary euthanasia keeps with the ultimate objective of healthcare. When debating the morality of voluntary euthanasia, it is important to consider why it is morally impermissible to kill a human being. According to Singer, the fact that killing is considered wrong simply because a being is human is not a strong enough reason for it to morally wrong in all situations. This idea that human life is intrinsically valuable stems from religious ideals and is commonly defended using deontology (Singer, “Voluntary” 528).…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To defeat this belief and undermine such closed minded views, I will raise an argument against active euthanasia in hopes to encourage doctors and other individuals to reconsider their current thoughts. Although, one might disagree with Rachels stance, I agree with his argument because there is no significant moral difference between passive and active euthanasia as the person will presume to be deceased after all. Thus, making his argument consistent and the doctrine, active euthanasia, just as justifiable and permissible as passive euthanasia. In some cases, it is permissible to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die, but it is never permissible to take any direct action intended to kill the patient. Not only is this view adopted by most doctors, but it is accepted in the American Medical Association statement: “…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This term is common to the medical profession where doctors kill terminally ill patients when their end is inevitable. Passive euthanasia involves doing nothing to prevent the end of life and letting nature run its course. The major controversy in medicine nowadays is whether or not killing an individual is worse then letting him or her die, since over the years we have considered the medical profession as one that saves lives in any and every situation. However, the defenders of active euthanasia suggest that the medical profession is not just one that saves lives but is also one that eases the pain, even if that involves inducing death. This contradicts the American Medical Association’s (AMA) views on euthanasia.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are two distinct types of euthanasia, both of which are entirely separate from PAS. A doctor withdrawing or withholding treatment is known as passive euthanasia. Although no one has taken any specific action that would case death, the lack of intervention has had the same effect. Active euthanasia is a doctor taking a specific action that will directly lead to death. For example a doctor injecting a patient with a lethal does of a drug is classified as active (Broeckaert 64).…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Euthanasia has been the topic of debate for years. The issue of surrounded by euthanasia effects ethical and legal that relates to patient and health care professionals (Naga & Mrayyan, 2013). Euthanasia is defined as the active killing of patients by doctor at the request of the patients. There are several types of euthanasia, active and passive, voluntary and involuntary. Active euthanasia refers steps that are taking to cause death; passive euthanasia refers to step that are taking to cause death by withholding treatment.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays