(A) If I had to reside in either the 17th or 18th century I would reside in the 18th century. There are many reasons I would rather live in the 1700s than than the 1600s starting off with the “Thirty Year’s War” that occurred in the 17th century. The Thirty Year’s War was on ongoing destructive war that was held in central Europe from 1618 and 1648 which caused about 3-11 million deaths from online sources. Another reason I would rather live in the 18th century is the advancement of technology and founding of new inventions that would come help us today. One of the most influential inventors at the time was Benjamin Franklin, who had many inventions from the lightning rod, modern steel, and bifocals. The last reason I would choose to live in the 18th century is because it's considered the age of enlightenment, it was a much more educated time and religion was not so forced but it was questioned with a more opened mind and not just following orders from the church.
(B) The most influential movement in humanities of the 17th and 18th century has to be the Scientific …show more content…
Although they share a huge mass, Rococo architecture is way more extravagant than Neoclassical architecture, and Neoclassical is much more simple. When talking about Sculpture both Rococo and Neoclassical seem like they are made from the same materials. When contrasting Rococo and Neoclassical sculpture, Rococo sculpture looks way more emotional and seems as if it was a story untold. Neoclassical sculpture is more focused on people or individuals sitting or just posing. Rococo paintings and Neoclassical paintings both share images or people and tell emotional stories as well. Rococo and Neoclassical paintings are different because the stories are much more controversial in Rococo paintings than they are in Neoclassical like in a famous Rococo painting “The