term1 Definition1term2 Definition2term3 Definition3
Please sign in to your Google account to access your documents:
Background
- Fear appeals are campaigns that try to invoke fear through showing the effect of the unhealthy behaviour
- psychologist suggest we become desensitised, we feel it will happen to others and not use
Aim
To investigate the consequences on emotions and behaviour of fear appeals in communication
Method/Design
- Lab experiment
- Participants shown fear arousing material
- Data collected through questionnaires on emotional reactions and changes in dental practises
Approach
Cognitive and Behavioural
Participants
- 200 student in total, 50 in each group
1. high fear arousal
2. moderate fear arousal
3. minimal fear arousal
4. control
Procedure
Group 1 - Pictures and descriptions of mouth disease, explanations of pain of gun disease and consequences like cancer
Group 2 - Similar pictures and descriptions as group one, less disturbing and dramatic
Group 3 - lecture about teeth cavities, but without referring to very serious consequences and using diagrams and x-rays
Group 4 - lecture of same length but on the structure and functioning of the human eye
Questionnaire given after lecture asking about emotional responses and follow up questionnaire about longer term effects of lecture one week later
Finding
- Knowledge on dental hygiene did not differ between three groups, all lectures successfully taught the material
- Strong fear appeal seen in more positive light, but more disliked
- Strong fear appeal showed a new increase in conformity to dental hygiene of 8%
- Moderate = 22%
- Minimal = 36%
- Control = 0%
Conclusion
- Overall effectiveness of a health promotion campaign is likely to be reduced by strong fear appeal
- Fear appeals can be helpful in changing behaviours, but it is important that the level of fear is tailored to each audience
Evaluation
+ Validity - IV was well defined and manipulated and therefore we can argue that the study was high in validity
+ Useful for increasing health behaviours in individuals, fear arousal may not be the msot effective way of promoting healthy living
- Ethnocentrism - first year students only, difficult to generalise to wider populations
- Reductionism - experiment has not considered the wider causes for the adoption of health behaviours
- Generalisability - low because we cannot easily generalise the results to other fear appeals from example smoking.
Need help typing ? See our FAQ (opens in new window)
Please sign in to create this set. We'll bring you back here when you are done.
Discard Changes Sign in
Please sign in to add to folders.
Sign in
Don't have an account? Sign Up »
You have created 2 folders. Please upgrade to Cram Premium to create hundreds of folders!