So how was roman leadership, strong? Well, the Roman social system was structured in such a way that the privileged were bound to the unprivileged and also supplied them with strong leadership. It was this tradeoff that secured that the power of Rome could be invoked upon the rest of Europe. The privileged were called Patricians; they were mainly dominant in Rome. They were extremely rich aristocrats, who controlled much of the trade going in and out of the capital as well as how things went in the Senate. The underprivileged were called Plebeians, they were originally just the laborers etc. Although in the Late Republic the social structure underwent radical reform during which Plebeian was offered the chance to serve in the military Plebeian accepted in such large amounts that Rome now had a nearly infinite …show more content…
Rome also employed a range of systematic tactics. Often allowing the leaders in place before the region was conquered to stay. They also pushed the conquered nations to learn to read, speak, and write Latin. With everyone on the same page language wise, it made it easier for travelers to get from place to place. The only real exceptions were in the Balkans and Greek City States due to the overall acceptance of Greek as a main language in the Roman Empire. However, it is said that with only these two languages, Latin and Greek you could travel the whole empire with little to no language problems. These systematic tactics enforced the Roman rule as well as allowed the conquered people to have leaders that they