Another example would involve someone who is a CEO. This subject is seen as a good person of character as they have created many new jobs and has a company that is soaring above all others. However, they have cut funding off for local orphanages and other organizations helping those in need in order to use the saved money for their own personal goals. The goodness of their character could still allow them to pass for virtuous, but Deontologically their actions have created a situation where people below them are in worse conditions. With this subject, the action they committed was wrong and since Deontologists base wrongness from actions, then the situation is wrong as well. Virtue Ethicists would not see that because of how many great things this subject has done to get where they are and how they are handling their power. Virtue and Deontological Ethics differ because of their own ways in which morality is handled, therefore not estimating what is needed to make our own character and situations more
Another example would involve someone who is a CEO. This subject is seen as a good person of character as they have created many new jobs and has a company that is soaring above all others. However, they have cut funding off for local orphanages and other organizations helping those in need in order to use the saved money for their own personal goals. The goodness of their character could still allow them to pass for virtuous, but Deontologically their actions have created a situation where people below them are in worse conditions. With this subject, the action they committed was wrong and since Deontologists base wrongness from actions, then the situation is wrong as well. Virtue Ethicists would not see that because of how many great things this subject has done to get where they are and how they are handling their power. Virtue and Deontological Ethics differ because of their own ways in which morality is handled, therefore not estimating what is needed to make our own character and situations more