One of the easiest yet most difficult thing a person can do is talk about themselves. As humans, we like talking about ourselves and the things that we like and what’s going on in our lives. We love it when someone asks them questions to get to know us, but when they start asking why and start to question why you do certain things the way we do, that’s when it start getting difficult. That’s when we start to ask ourselves those very same questions. Why DO I actually lead the way I do? Why DO I like control and structure in life? Today I am going to try and answer the hard questions. In this paper, I will explore the “whys” of who I am and what me who I am. I will be talking about my tolerance of ambiguity, my learning style, my dominant conflict management style, and my dominant reaction to dissonance.
Analysis- Tolerance of Ambiguity …show more content…
Ambiguity basically means uncertainty. A tolerance of ambiguity is one’s tolerance for uncertainty. Do they prefer a more “we’ll figure it out as we go” attitude or do they prefer a more “let’s make a plan for everything so we know what to expect” attitude? Someone who has a tolerance of ambiguity is comfortable with flexibility, the unfamiliar, ambiguous situations, and other things that don’t provide much certainty. Someone who is intolerant for ambiguity means that they enjoy structure and certainty. They like planning, and putting things in neat little boxes with a bow. They enjoy categorizing and prefer things and ideas that are familiar to