The Uniform Crime Report was created and is used to provide credible criminal justice statistics for operations of the criminal justice system as well as for the management of the criminal justice administration. (Uniform Crime, 2014) The Uniform Crime Report and the National Crime Victimization Survey measure overlapping, yet not quite identical, crimes. The National Crime Victimization Survey helps provide unavailable information regarding crimes, victims, and offenders. This includes crimes that go unreported to the police for various reasons. An additional difference is that The National Crime Victimization Survey does not include arson, commercial crime, crimes against kids under the age of 12, and homicide, whereas the Uniform Crime Report does include those categories of crime. However, the Uniform Crime Report details crimes reported to law enforcement, yet only collects arrest data regarding sexual assault other than rape, and simple assault. (Bureau of, 2015) The difference in how the data is collected by the Uniform Crime Report and The National Crime Victimization Survey allows for different definitions of crimes like, for example, burglary. The National Crime Victimization Survey defines burglary as the attempted or successful entry of a residence by someone who had no right to be in the residence and tries not to ask the victims to consider …show more content…
People in the Northeast are at a likelihood of about 19 per 1000 people for becoming victims of violent crime as compared to the Midwest, the South and the West at about 20 per 1000 people. The variation is slight yet it shows there is a degree of variation in the rate of victimization. When it comes to property crimes, the difference is much more noticeable. Property crimes in the Northeast are at nearly 86 per 1000 people compared to about 112 per 1000 people in the Midwest, about 116 per 1000 people in the South region, and a significant difference of 153 per 1000 people in the West. There could be many reasons for this, including differences of organized crime in different parts of the country as well as the wealth distribution among the people of each different region. (Bureau of,