Chief Justice Roberts’s dissenting opinion is absolute, he was advocating on the Americans’ right of freedom, supreme court’s …show more content…
I believe he wanted urge his audiences about the sadness and injustice because we are no longer follow the law. Reversely, we choose to go against our ethnic and law for “superficial changes” over the time. In this event, the “superficial changes” can be referring to the changes of mentality and social influences among people or in a community; they became feeling unhappy or happy and unfair. For example: Cindy Crawford’s effect from the article “The Ugly Truth About Beauty” by Dave Barry, people believed Crawford’s body shape is the best and ideal figure for every woman. In the past, many women were unhappy about their appearance. However, our society has changed a point of view now. And they began to recognize the beauty of plus-sized body shape women by a complimentary of words such as “chubby”, “curvy” and …show more content…
But as a judge, I find the majority’s position indefensible as a matter of constitutional law” (10).
Indeed, Roberts has a very persuasive persona this dissenting opinion because he is a highly educated legal expert and a chief justice for the United States supreme court, therefore his words and writing are incredibly defined as genuine, sincere, credible and fair to his audiences from the general public, his peers, to the same-sex couples and the supporters. And so we can assure that Chief Justice Roberts’s persona is a non-bias constitutional law representative.
Finally, I concluded that Chief Justice Roberts’s dissenting opinion is effective because many facts and research have proven are true and convincing. Even though the same-sex marriage law has passed however it is still not completely accepted by our society. At the end, we have to recognize the fact that same-sex marriage’s decision must keep within a state, not United States supreme court. While, Americans must insist on our right of freedom; we must respect our law system and the democratic system should decide for Gay Marriage