Prohibiting the choice of selecting a preferred book puts a restraint on children's rights and awareness. In the article called "Intellectual Freedom, Censorship..." the authors wrote, "The court conceded that school boards are responsible for monitoring the education of their students...that is educationally unsuitable...; however, they cannot stifle students' rights just because they object to a certain viewpoint or idea" (Mclaughlin and Hendricks 9). Removing the freedom to choose what one likes is against the First Amendment which includes the freedom of speech. Without a way of choice to express oneself then everyone would be restricted to making any decisions for themselves and standing
Prohibiting the choice of selecting a preferred book puts a restraint on children's rights and awareness. In the article called "Intellectual Freedom, Censorship..." the authors wrote, "The court conceded that school boards are responsible for monitoring the education of their students...that is educationally unsuitable...; however, they cannot stifle students' rights just because they object to a certain viewpoint or idea" (Mclaughlin and Hendricks 9). Removing the freedom to choose what one likes is against the First Amendment which includes the freedom of speech. Without a way of choice to express oneself then everyone would be restricted to making any decisions for themselves and standing