This is why social demands played an enormous role in the correlation of style as well as creation of clothing. As new trends are endorsed, people would want a quantity of all the new wear being released in a variety of shapes, sizes, and colors, showing an increase in social demand. With no other choice, the manufacturing of these items must remain parallel to this rapid change. Because of the rate at which this conversion occurs, issues tend to arise in the development of clothing creation. For example, as seen in Source 1, before the American civil war, ready-made apparel existed for men but in very limited quantities. As the war proliferated, there was a mandate for additional uniforms, which developed the formation of factories that facilitated the mass production of uniforms at a quick and efficient pace. Despite contributing to the development in clothing creation, “mass-produced clothing was sometimes seen as a loss of individuality” (Source 1). This was the result of the similarity of the clothing, causing a lack in variation of style from individual-to-individual. While there was an increase in advancement of apparel manufacturing, there was a decrease in clothing style all due to the social request from the war; therefore, illustrating the relationship between the factors. Additionally, this social demand was specifically seen in women of higher social status. The developments of clothing creations drove these women to domesticated, materialistic lifestyles. Though, contrary to the men in war, their clothing was hand-made, thus, allowing for more individuality, which not only demonstrates an example of how development in clothing creation increased clothing style, but also showing terms of which the relationship between clothing style and development in clothing creation exists. Modifications to clothing creation effects clothing style and vise
This is why social demands played an enormous role in the correlation of style as well as creation of clothing. As new trends are endorsed, people would want a quantity of all the new wear being released in a variety of shapes, sizes, and colors, showing an increase in social demand. With no other choice, the manufacturing of these items must remain parallel to this rapid change. Because of the rate at which this conversion occurs, issues tend to arise in the development of clothing creation. For example, as seen in Source 1, before the American civil war, ready-made apparel existed for men but in very limited quantities. As the war proliferated, there was a mandate for additional uniforms, which developed the formation of factories that facilitated the mass production of uniforms at a quick and efficient pace. Despite contributing to the development in clothing creation, “mass-produced clothing was sometimes seen as a loss of individuality” (Source 1). This was the result of the similarity of the clothing, causing a lack in variation of style from individual-to-individual. While there was an increase in advancement of apparel manufacturing, there was a decrease in clothing style all due to the social request from the war; therefore, illustrating the relationship between the factors. Additionally, this social demand was specifically seen in women of higher social status. The developments of clothing creations drove these women to domesticated, materialistic lifestyles. Though, contrary to the men in war, their clothing was hand-made, thus, allowing for more individuality, which not only demonstrates an example of how development in clothing creation increased clothing style, but also showing terms of which the relationship between clothing style and development in clothing creation exists. Modifications to clothing creation effects clothing style and vise