Does this mean assessing non-cognitive competencies is the answer? Rattan, Savani, Chugh, and Dweck (2015) offer several policy recommendations to improve student mindsets: include mindsets in federal grant proposal guidelines; make them a written policy objective in Department of Education publications; encourage states to request federal money to begin interventions; teach mindsets during content-area classes; invest in curricular materials; provide PD to teachers on how to grow students’ mindsets; and increase research and publish research findings in resources such as the Department of Education’s What Works Clearinghouse (p. 723). A list such as this could have been written to propel forward a myriad of educational reform recommendations: formative classroom assessments, cooperative learning, project based learning, mathematics process standards, media literacy, metacognition, digital writing, personalized learning, and content area literacy standards are just a few. This short list of “hot topics” fill bookshelves, professional journals, and conference agendas. Each of the interchangeable terms for non-cognitive competencies, mindsets; grit; social and emotional learning; soft skills; and personal qualities, fit comfortably on this list. Like other reform efforts, appeals will be made to their importance and money will be generated for those leading the rallying cry, but no widespread adoption of non-cognitive competencies will occur because it remains a choice whether to jump on this bandwagon as long as they are not included in accountability measures. The word is out about non-cognitive competencies; Mindsets, published in 2006, is on the new and noteworthy shelf right now at the Plainfield Barnes & Nobles and Carol Dweck will be a keynote
Does this mean assessing non-cognitive competencies is the answer? Rattan, Savani, Chugh, and Dweck (2015) offer several policy recommendations to improve student mindsets: include mindsets in federal grant proposal guidelines; make them a written policy objective in Department of Education publications; encourage states to request federal money to begin interventions; teach mindsets during content-area classes; invest in curricular materials; provide PD to teachers on how to grow students’ mindsets; and increase research and publish research findings in resources such as the Department of Education’s What Works Clearinghouse (p. 723). A list such as this could have been written to propel forward a myriad of educational reform recommendations: formative classroom assessments, cooperative learning, project based learning, mathematics process standards, media literacy, metacognition, digital writing, personalized learning, and content area literacy standards are just a few. This short list of “hot topics” fill bookshelves, professional journals, and conference agendas. Each of the interchangeable terms for non-cognitive competencies, mindsets; grit; social and emotional learning; soft skills; and personal qualities, fit comfortably on this list. Like other reform efforts, appeals will be made to their importance and money will be generated for those leading the rallying cry, but no widespread adoption of non-cognitive competencies will occur because it remains a choice whether to jump on this bandwagon as long as they are not included in accountability measures. The word is out about non-cognitive competencies; Mindsets, published in 2006, is on the new and noteworthy shelf right now at the Plainfield Barnes & Nobles and Carol Dweck will be a keynote