Equality is not a process of giving everyone access to the same things so that everyone progresses at individual paces, but a process of helping the underprivileged rise to an attainable level for all. In contrast to the statements of Castañeda, Grandin 's statements about Chávez 's as the force behind the truest form of democracy in Latin America. Meanwhile, Catañeda presents Chávez as a president that …show more content…
In place of ignoring the everyday person who fell behind in society due to the oppressive and ruthless nature of humanity, placing them as the centriole of concern and assisting them becomes the key to mobilizing society and abiding by true democracy. In order to have a steadfast democracy, we must look at the presidential period of Chávez in Venezuela, which prioritizes the capability of common people of the nation to change their socio-economic status versus remaining stagnant due to a lack of