This act allows government officers “to obtain judicial authorization for intercepting communications and wiretapping” (“Electronic Communications Privacy Act”). However, by permitting this act is as going against the principles that the founding fathers embodied in the first modern republic. Since it is something chimerical to think that the government will be led by impeccable individuals that will always make the right decisions for its citizens. Title III in the act, when “government entities are authorized to trace devices” without the people’s consent (“Privacy Act”). On one hand, the government might argue that with this permission and advances in technology they have been able to arrest criminals. On the other hand, there is no total certainty that not every person is victim and being tracked at every move when there are only suspicions of illegal
This act allows government officers “to obtain judicial authorization for intercepting communications and wiretapping” (“Electronic Communications Privacy Act”). However, by permitting this act is as going against the principles that the founding fathers embodied in the first modern republic. Since it is something chimerical to think that the government will be led by impeccable individuals that will always make the right decisions for its citizens. Title III in the act, when “government entities are authorized to trace devices” without the people’s consent (“Privacy Act”). On one hand, the government might argue that with this permission and advances in technology they have been able to arrest criminals. On the other hand, there is no total certainty that not every person is victim and being tracked at every move when there are only suspicions of illegal