The point of this article is to explain the contrasting organizations that are involved with endangered animals, and zoos. The first part of the article is spent describing what the different organizations do to help. The second part of the article describes all of the differing endangered birds, and what zoos and people could be doing to save endangered animals. The author lists the endangered birds: Condors, Guam Birds, Hawaiian Birds, and others too. This article mentions what zoos are doing to assist wildlife conservation, and how workers of the Colonial Waterbird Society aid zoos as well. The author tries to convince the workers of the Colonial Waterbird Society to help zoos, and to help his cause.
This article came from JSTOR, a reliable academic journal source. The goal of this source is to explain all of the different organizations that are helping endangered animals. This article could assist the research question, but is very limiting because the author only explains the endangered birds, and not any of the other endangered animals. Even though the author makes good points that show that zoos are helping endangered birds. This article is biased because it only was the author asking for …show more content…
Barbara King exploits Bengt Holst, the man that authorized the killing of the lion. The goal of this article is to show people what actually happens in zoos. Another objective was for King to argue with the points that Holst made with him agreeing with the killing of healthy animals. This article is very useful for this research question because most articles try to show favorable events that happen at zoos and this article just shows the bad and really opens peoples’ eyes. This information is reliable because it comes from NPR, a dependable and popular news