3). Anecdotes are not a reliable source of evidence because the variables are not controlled (para. 8). Mankind also has a fallible memory and tend to only remember one side of a story when retelling it, making the data biased (para. 19). Anecdotes are however still useful in science because they help bridge the gap between science based medicine and the public (para. 25). Anecdotes are also helpful because they are real life experience, therefore easier for a patient to relate to than some scientific facts (para. …show more content…
5). Some people may benefit more or less from the drug and it was found that some lives were even shortened by taking Avastin (para. 5). b) Barbara Moss received Avastin treated along with chemotherapy to treat her cancer in 2006 and was still alive in when Goldacre’s (2010) article was written (para. 6). Her story was unlike most patients, since the length of the average patient’s life only increased from 19.9 months to 21.3 months (para. 5). Since Moss’s story is unlike the majority of the sample size, it was an unfair representation for the average Avastin user. Journalist’s and media caught onto Moss’s story and it eventually caught the attention of politicians (para. 9). Moss’s unrepresentative anecdote led the Conservative government to invest enough money in Avastin to assist 2381 patients in living around 6 more weeks, then the money was lost (para.