This conclusion is a commonplace of human experience. And it shows the difference between sociology and science. It shows how sociology is never 100% fact or proven theory whereas science is hard evidence and does not have an opinion. Again a great example on why science should be removed from social science. With the few examples I have plugged into this essay I want to explain why Postman describes social science as storytelling. With sociologist everything is based on research of humans where a scientist is someone who does research toward a more comprehensive understanding of nature, including physical, mathematical and engineering aspect of life. So when Postman is describing sociologist as storytellers he is not being critical he is actually right in a way because you are gaining evidence from sociologist that has gained research from the behavior of a human that can potentially have a different outcome if they are put in a different
This conclusion is a commonplace of human experience. And it shows the difference between sociology and science. It shows how sociology is never 100% fact or proven theory whereas science is hard evidence and does not have an opinion. Again a great example on why science should be removed from social science. With the few examples I have plugged into this essay I want to explain why Postman describes social science as storytelling. With sociologist everything is based on research of humans where a scientist is someone who does research toward a more comprehensive understanding of nature, including physical, mathematical and engineering aspect of life. So when Postman is describing sociologist as storytellers he is not being critical he is actually right in a way because you are gaining evidence from sociologist that has gained research from the behavior of a human that can potentially have a different outcome if they are put in a different