To begin, I would like to discuss one of my best papers, Editorial paper. This particular paper best illustrates my strength in organization, maintaining focus, and …show more content…
I consider that many of my weaknesses come into play when I am reviewing my papers. One of the weaknesses is the absence of ability to intricate on the supports by thinking critically. I might have good evidence but I can always strengthen it by being more real and intense. Another weakness is the using variety of sentence. I and my peers have noticed that the majority of the sentences are very long through the essays, which tends to make the essay dull. The last and most important, weakness of mine is the tone of voice. This is probably one of the main areas I need to work on. I have to be more careful with my choice of words and also keeping my audience in mind when writing paper. However, in both papers I have a clear and strong emphasis with some good supports. I have used a couple of good examples in the Rogerian paper for the opposing side, and in my Editorial paper to support my point of view as well as others. Although I got my introduction and conclusion out properly well, I still feel that my transitions need little bit