The film gave an overview of the role of women in sports, and how they're represented. One thing I agree with the film on was when it focused on the general population not seeing women being as strong as men, and women’s athletics not getting as much airtime as their male counterparts (Playing Unfair). I see this injustice playing out myself in my everyday life. Over the years I think women being seen as instantly weaker than men have certainly gotten better, but I believe that the underlying thought still exists. But, the coverage of women’s sports is a different story, to this day it is still under-reported on. Besides world events such as the Olympics, or the women’s World Cup, you will barely ever see women’s sports being broadcasted. On the other hand, there was a lot in the film that I did not agree with. The biggest thing I disagreed with was when all of those interviewed seemed to be putting down and demeaning the female athletes that posed in seductive ways for magazines, and advertisements (Playing Unfair). And to me, doing this is somewhat absurd. Whenever these pictures are taken they are completely consensual, and these athletes are completely fine with it. If these female athletes are proud of the bodies that they have achieved, and having these pictures of them empowers them, then no …show more content…
Michael J. Boride’s article gave me a solution for a problem that I never thought of before. I used to think that there should just be general neutral bathrooms, but making them single person eliminates many problems that come with that solution. The film Playing Unfair showed made me realize the unequal coverage women’s sports get, and showed me how far we have come since the creation of the film to include them, Also, Ross Tucker’s article, published by The Science of Sport, and titled “Let Male And Female Compete Together: The Abolition Of Gender Categories In Sport: A Sound Argument?” solidified my point that, if they meet the same skill level as all the other athletes, then women should play in men’s leagues. Even if Tucker’s point was to show that we should separate men’s and women’s sports, the flaws in their argument are what solidified my point. According to Tucker, the best in every men’s league is far superior to the best athletes in the women’s league, which may be true, but that doesn’t cover the lower to mid-tier level at which women may very well