One common characteristic that is shared by both is the importance of trade. In the case of Egypt luxury goods, such as wood from the Levant, flowed into the country. Egypt served as both an important importer of these luxuries and as the trade hub between Africa and Eurasia. The communities that developed in Southeastern Asia, particularly Angkor, also served an important role in trade networks. It served as a link in the network that connected the Far East and with the Middle East and Europe. It is important to note here that while both played important roles within their respective trade networks, Egypt played a much more dominant role whereas Angkor played a more secondary role to the other powers trading on the network. Another common element between these two polities is the development of a clear social hierarchy. This can be seen in the varying elaborateness of burial goods found in Southeast Asia and the vastly different scale of burial architecture between groups in Ancient
One common characteristic that is shared by both is the importance of trade. In the case of Egypt luxury goods, such as wood from the Levant, flowed into the country. Egypt served as both an important importer of these luxuries and as the trade hub between Africa and Eurasia. The communities that developed in Southeastern Asia, particularly Angkor, also served an important role in trade networks. It served as a link in the network that connected the Far East and with the Middle East and Europe. It is important to note here that while both played important roles within their respective trade networks, Egypt played a much more dominant role whereas Angkor played a more secondary role to the other powers trading on the network. Another common element between these two polities is the development of a clear social hierarchy. This can be seen in the varying elaborateness of burial goods found in Southeast Asia and the vastly different scale of burial architecture between groups in Ancient