The movie preceded the book in this case. This film was developed by two directors from southern France, where the events actually took place. Each …show more content…
But the book unlike the movie gives more of a personal connection. However, in the film much emphasis is placed on the how the story is viewed and presented with that being done the viewers are able to see what the characters look like, and what the setting of the town looked like. However, the individual reading the text will not have these feelings from the book because the description the people and the environment in the text is extremely vague. Davis feels as if the film deviates too much away from the primary source she also acknowledges that in areas that were the evidence was not present that a “certain leap of faith” had to take place in the story which is something that she created. When a filmmaker creates a film there is an artistic license, this doesn’t just stick to the film makers. On the other side of the spectrum there are also processes of inductive reasoning that the authors have to abide by as well. As a matter of fact, in her book she mentions “the wife’s and judges inner contradictions were softened in the