Additionally, the philosopher Immanuel Kant’s theory of morality or the categorical imperative, states that it is immoral to use another person merely as a “means to an end” (MacKinnon, 2009, P.117)’ and that person must be treated “as ends in themselves” (MacKinnon, 2009, P.117) so that the humankind who is willing to serve as the means to the ends of others, will necessarily regard others as the means to his ends. In the other hand, Kant’s moral theory argued that the categorical imperative is better revealing what you have not to do than to tell you what you ought to do. In conclusion, let’s appreciate these Kant’ deontological theories to help the humankind to mean an end in himself, not the means to the ends of others so that the pursuit of his own self-interest and happiness may be the highest moral purpose of his life. I like these rhetoric moral
Additionally, the philosopher Immanuel Kant’s theory of morality or the categorical imperative, states that it is immoral to use another person merely as a “means to an end” (MacKinnon, 2009, P.117)’ and that person must be treated “as ends in themselves” (MacKinnon, 2009, P.117) so that the humankind who is willing to serve as the means to the ends of others, will necessarily regard others as the means to his ends. In the other hand, Kant’s moral theory argued that the categorical imperative is better revealing what you have not to do than to tell you what you ought to do. In conclusion, let’s appreciate these Kant’ deontological theories to help the humankind to mean an end in himself, not the means to the ends of others so that the pursuit of his own self-interest and happiness may be the highest moral purpose of his life. I like these rhetoric moral