He claims that psychopaths are unable to tell the difference between why something is morally wrong or commonly wrong. This shows that psychopaths do not make moral judgments on their own, they make judgments based on what they are told is right and what is wrong. Meaning they lack empathy, which is important when it comes to determining one’s capacity for moral judgments. But does this argument really say about psychopaths? Nichols’ argument points out that psychopaths suffer from relevant rational defects; they are less likely to differentiate between moral and conventional violations. This shows that while they understand right from wrong, they are unable to understand why something is morally wrong, which would mean they don’t have the capacity for moral judgments. If moral judgments are influenced by moral motivation, then psychopaths don’t support empirical
He claims that psychopaths are unable to tell the difference between why something is morally wrong or commonly wrong. This shows that psychopaths do not make moral judgments on their own, they make judgments based on what they are told is right and what is wrong. Meaning they lack empathy, which is important when it comes to determining one’s capacity for moral judgments. But does this argument really say about psychopaths? Nichols’ argument points out that psychopaths suffer from relevant rational defects; they are less likely to differentiate between moral and conventional violations. This shows that while they understand right from wrong, they are unable to understand why something is morally wrong, which would mean they don’t have the capacity for moral judgments. If moral judgments are influenced by moral motivation, then psychopaths don’t support empirical