During the Philadelphia Convention, where the new Constitution was developed, not all the men agreed on ratifying the document. Even though, the Article of Confederation was already demolished, with the new Constitution, many men still believed that it should have not been replaced, but simply changed. As the men were divided, the Federalist Papers served as an logical and different perspective for the document. In the second article, it states, “Distinguished members of that Congress, who have been since tried and justly approved for patriotism and abilities, and who have grown old in acquired political information, were also members of this convention, and carried into it their accumulated knowledge and experiences.” The quote describes the men who were involved in the creation of the Constitution, are highly impeccable and were the same ones who created the Article of Confederation; thus, their recommendation for this document should be taken into consideration. The Federalist Papers debated that in the new Constitution, it was the best fit for the replacement of the Article of Confederation, in every article applauding its creators and its
During the Philadelphia Convention, where the new Constitution was developed, not all the men agreed on ratifying the document. Even though, the Article of Confederation was already demolished, with the new Constitution, many men still believed that it should have not been replaced, but simply changed. As the men were divided, the Federalist Papers served as an logical and different perspective for the document. In the second article, it states, “Distinguished members of that Congress, who have been since tried and justly approved for patriotism and abilities, and who have grown old in acquired political information, were also members of this convention, and carried into it their accumulated knowledge and experiences.” The quote describes the men who were involved in the creation of the Constitution, are highly impeccable and were the same ones who created the Article of Confederation; thus, their recommendation for this document should be taken into consideration. The Federalist Papers debated that in the new Constitution, it was the best fit for the replacement of the Article of Confederation, in every article applauding its creators and its