The federalist paper 70 is an important document that talks about the welfare of the people of the state of New York based on administration of the laws the government. This paper tries to explore the definition of a good government, for it is important for the protection of property against those irregular practices at that time which sometimes interferes with the normal course of justice; to the security of independency against the enterprises and assaults of goals, of faction, and anarchy.
To be specific, the federalist paper 70 is a piece which was written by Alexander Hamilton explaining about the unified executive provided for in the United States Constitution. It was published on March 15, 1788 in The New York describes …show more content…
The President 's competent powers guaranteed by the Constitution are talked of in Federalist No.70 particularly the executive power (Hamilton et al pp 130-pp 151). Hamilton says that the executive provides stability as it prevents the excess of lawmaking processes and that the executive and judicial review is able to protect the executive from legislative misuse of power. This discussion is related to Hamilton 's liking of the separation of powers in Federal government, which permits the president to execute the laws and carry out their duty as a commander in-chief without being afraid of legislative encroachment on their powers.
The argument is important to understanding the foundation of the presidency because it goes into detail to why the president should be in power. Hamilton still makes the case for duration, implying a presidential term ought to be sufficient so as to support stability in the government of the states. While Hamilton illustrates on the significance of duration in Federalist No. 70, he describes briefly in Federalist No. 70 that the issue of more period in office is supposed to motivate a president to govern in the most appropriate interest of the views of the …show more content…
In Federalist paper, Alexander Hamilton does not only put down an argument for a unified executive, but also provides ways to counter arguments in support of a many executive. Hamilton uses historical instances and the use of common sense to warn the American people of the downfalls of an executive that is not united structure (Mosteller et al,pp