He personifies the two species of hope, clarifying the dangers of indulging in an expectation “dictated not by hope, but by desire,” separating logic from want and explaining the potential consequences. In opening his description of hope with personification, Johnson acknowledges its natural existence in the human experience and the consequent difficulty in cultivating only the logical hope based on facts rather than emotion. However, he simultaneously frames his statements with antithesis, showing that although the line may initially be difficult to determine, the two hopes share few similarities and hold far more potential to harm than to help. Furthermore, Johnson employs passive voice when describing the scenarios in which hope built of desire thrives, writing of the “expectation that requires the common course of things to be changed, and the general rules of action to be broken.” The passive language acts as an example for the very process his rhetoric delineates, illustrating a scenario in which an external subject must take on a role that does not naturally belong to it.…