They agreed on the basics such as the positive nature of happiness and somewhat general definition, but as the debate turnes to the evaluation of measuring happiness, a majority agree that happiness cannot be effectively measured while Agarwal and Lyubomirsky support the measurement. This same trend is followed when the issue of public policy is risen by those that were in favor of measuring happiness. They failed to realize that the others in the debate were in agreement that measurement could not be done accurately or consistently in the first place. Overall, a majority of those in the debate are arguing similar issues; however Agarwal and Porter drop out of the argument because of their push for policy while the others were not in agreement for the measurement of
They agreed on the basics such as the positive nature of happiness and somewhat general definition, but as the debate turnes to the evaluation of measuring happiness, a majority agree that happiness cannot be effectively measured while Agarwal and Lyubomirsky support the measurement. This same trend is followed when the issue of public policy is risen by those that were in favor of measuring happiness. They failed to realize that the others in the debate were in agreement that measurement could not be done accurately or consistently in the first place. Overall, a majority of those in the debate are arguing similar issues; however Agarwal and Porter drop out of the argument because of their push for policy while the others were not in agreement for the measurement of