For the case of the People vs. Goldilocks it was the liberty of a little girl who was born to a troubled life of abuse that was in jeopardy of being taken from her. In conclusion, Goldilocks has now provided a significant amount of tangible evidence on her behalf that should exalt her from any criminal liability for the death of Prince Charming. This is rightfully so because in the moment Goldilocks was afraid for her life and she acted in a manner necessary to protect herself. However, in the interest of the public a life was taken and for that to be dismissed, “civility calls for offering an excuse for one’s conduct even though one believes that one was justified” (Baron, 2007). Fortunate enough for the young Goldilocks in this instance it was
For the case of the People vs. Goldilocks it was the liberty of a little girl who was born to a troubled life of abuse that was in jeopardy of being taken from her. In conclusion, Goldilocks has now provided a significant amount of tangible evidence on her behalf that should exalt her from any criminal liability for the death of Prince Charming. This is rightfully so because in the moment Goldilocks was afraid for her life and she acted in a manner necessary to protect herself. However, in the interest of the public a life was taken and for that to be dismissed, “civility calls for offering an excuse for one’s conduct even though one believes that one was justified” (Baron, 2007). Fortunate enough for the young Goldilocks in this instance it was