Building informal relationships amongst corporate leaders and coworkers is a key component to moving up the corporate ladder. Additionally, by being sociable and connected to coworkers and other corporate leaders, one can develop extra skills from mentoring and gain opportunities that would otherwise be unavailable. However, especially in male dominated fields women may not have access to all the same networks men use to to develop informal work relationships in the company, thus contributing to the gender barrier (Lockwood). For example, golfing with a boss or going for lunch would be a way men often build relationships with the leaders of a company in hopes of achieving promotions. Many would find it strange for a woman to go golfing with the boss due to the nature and perception that these are deemed male activities. Additionally, some would perceive a woman going to lunch with a male boss as inappropriate compared to a man. Making the right connections can rapidly and positively affect ones professional development and without that opportunity to make those workplace connections, women are …show more content…
“Boards of directors, which are mostly comprised of men, sometimes perpetuate the status quo by selecting CEOs who look like them” (Lockwood). These leaders maintain the organizational hierarchy and traditional procedures relating to hiring, seniority, promotion, and other practices that benefit themselves at the seclusion of others. Organizations tend to mirror society’s perspective about which types of people are appropriate for different types of jobs. These cultural stereotypes and biases restrict the movement of qualified and motivated individuals from positions that they could perform exceedingly well in. Hiring and promotion decisions are expected to be based upon merit and actual qualification for the position; instead many organizations continue to conform to society’s expectations for a person’s particular position based upon gender, race, and class. Stereotyping plays a huge role in the employment industry. Resume studies have shown that, among identical resumes where only the name differs, gender affects whether the candidate is hired, the starting salary offered, and the employer’s overall assessment of the candidate’s quality (Council of Economic Advisers, 5). All too often the perceptions of society poison the minds of employers and can influence how they view applicants. Physiological studies have found that people notice,